Predictors of postoperative infectious complications after partial nephrectomy: Analysis at a referral institution
- PMID: 40458582
- PMCID: PMC12126922
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.06.002
Predictors of postoperative infectious complications after partial nephrectomy: Analysis at a referral institution
Abstract
Objective: Infectious complications after partial nephrectomy (PN) remain a significant concern. We aimed to analyze predictive factors of postoperative infectious complications (PICs) occurring after PN.
Methods: Data on patients undergoing PN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 were retrieved from prospectively maintained institutional database and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the occurrence of PICs during admission for PN. A PIC was defined by clinical and/or imaging findings of an infectious process plus microbial isolation upon culture examination. Multivariable logistic regression analysis after adjusting for potential confounders evaluated predictors of a PIC.
Results: Six-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent PN; rough incidence of PICs was 11%, with median time to PIC onset of 1 (interquartile range 0-3) day. Compared to patients without PIC events, the PIC group showed a significantly higher proportion of open surgeries (54% vs. 20%, p<0.001), bleeding events (23% vs. 10%, p<0.01), postoperative transfusion (19% vs. 5.0%, p<0.001), and urinary leakage (4.2% vs. 0.18%, p=0.01), and a statistically significantly higher median hemoglobin drop from baseline (-2.6 g/dL vs. -1.7 g/dL, p=0.001). At multivariable logistic regression, the odds of experiencing a PIC were statistically significantly lower after minimally-invasive surgery compared to open surgery (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.59), and higher for patients who received transfusion (odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.10-2.54).
Conclusion: We underlined factors that impact the occurrence of PICs and, consequently, duration of hospitalization following PN. By addressing these predictors, clinicians can promote enhanced patient recovery.
Keywords: Complication; Infection; Nephrectomy; Renal neoplasm.
© 2025 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.Vé.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- EAU guidelines on urological infections. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections. [Accessed January 5, 2024].
-
- Carrara E., Sibani M., Barbato L., Mazzaferri F., Salerno N.D., Conti M., et al. How to “SAVE” antibiotics: effectiveness and sustainability of a new model of antibiotic stewardship intervention in the internal medicine area. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;60 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106672. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Grabe M., Botto H., Cek M., Tenke P., Wagenlehner F.M.E., Naber K.G., et al. Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures. World J Urol. 2012;30:39–50. - PubMed
-
- Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–383. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources