Advances and critical aspects in cancer treatment development using digital twins
- PMID: 40458986
- PMCID: PMC12130972
- DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf237
Advances and critical aspects in cancer treatment development using digital twins
Abstract
The emergence of digital twins (DTs) in the arena of anticancer treatment echoes the transformative impact of artificial intelligence in drug development. DTs provide dynamic, accessible platforms that may accurately replicate patient and tumor characteristics. The potential of DTs in clinical investigation is particularly compelling. By comparing data from virtual trials with conventional trial results, medical teams can significantly enhance the reliability of their studies. Moreover, a significant breakthrough in clinical research is the ability of DT to augment patient data during ongoing trials, enabling adaptive trial designs and more robust statistical analyses to be performed even with limited patient populations. The development of DTs faces however several technical and methodological challenges. These include their tendency to produce unreliable predictions, non-factual information, reasoning errors, systematic biases, and a lack of interpretability. Future research in this field should focus on an interdisciplinary approach that brings together experts from diverse fields, including mathematicians, biologists, and physicians. This collaborative strategy promises to unlock new frontiers in personalized cancer treatment and medical methodologies.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; clinical trials; digital twins; drug discovery; oncology.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532315
References
-
- Wong H-H, Jessup A, Sertkaya A. et al. Examination of Clinical Trial Costs and Barriers for Drug Development Final. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health & Human Services, 2014. 1–92.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical