Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;94(6S Suppl 4):S549-S554.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004391.

Financial Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Robert G DeVito  1 , Benjamin G Ke  2 , Kristen Stephens  1 , Scott T Hollenbeck  1 , Chris A Campbell  1 , John T Stranix  1
Affiliations

Financial Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Robert G DeVito et al. Ann Plast Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways have become increasingly common in surgery, but the ERAS financial impact on autologous breast reconstruction has not been defined.

Methods: This study performed a retrospective review of consecutive autologous breast reconstructions (July 2017 to June 2022; 264 patients, 156 pre-ERAS implementation and 108 post-ERAS implementation). Clinical outcomes included length of stay (LOS), ICU length of stay (ICU LOS), average daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use, and average total MME use. Financial metrics evaluated the total charges, total cost, direct cost, indirect cost, estimated reimbursement, and direct margin.

Results: Average LOS was lower in the ERAS cohort (2.13 vs. 3.21 days, P < 0.001). Average ICU LOS was lower in the ERAS cohort (0.0 vs 0.75 days, P < 0.001). Total charges were lower in the ERAS cohort ($98,876 vs. $119,568, P < 0.001). Total cost was lower in the ERAS cohort ($25,725 vs. $30,972, P < 0.001). Direct cost was lower in the ERAS cohort ($15,900 vs. $18,823, P < 0.001). Indirect cost was lower in the ERAS cohort ($9825 vs. $12,149, P < 0.001). Estimated reimbursement was equivalent ($27,464 vs. $24,697, P = 0.14). Direct margin was higher in the ERAS cohort ($11,564 vs. $5874, P = 0.0015).

Conclusions: ERAS pathways in autologous breast reconstruction decrease length of stay, ICU utilization, and improve financial metrics. Further investigations into quality improvements in ERAS warrant investigation.

Keywords: ERAS; autologous; breast; finance; reconstruction; recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

References

    1. Stone R, Scheib S. Advantages of, and adaptations to, enhanced recovery protocols for perioperative care during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:481–489.
    1. Persing S, Manahan M, Rosson G. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2020;47:221–243.
    1. Xu Y, Liu A, Chen L, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway optimizes outcomes and costs for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060520920072.
    1. Nieminen T, Tapiovaara L, Bäck L, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;281:907–914.
    1. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:292–298.