A comparison of outcomes after radiosurgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with one versus more than twenty brain metastases: an international multi-center study
- PMID: 40459832
- DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-05093-y
A comparison of outcomes after radiosurgery in non-small cell lung cancer patients with one versus more than twenty brain metastases: an international multi-center study
Abstract
Background: Whether the number or cumulative volume of brain metastases affects survival in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We conducted a volume matched multi-center study to determine whether patients with a single metastasis had better outcomes than patients with > 20 brain metastases.
Methods: Between 2014 and 2022, 317 NSCLC patients (21.14% female; single tumor: 278 patients; >20 tumors, 39 patients) underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The prescribed margin dose, cumulative tumor volume, 12 Gy volume, and concurrent systematic disease managements were recorded. The overall survival (OS), local tumor control (LTC), adverse radiation effect (ARE) risk, and new tumor development were compared.
Results: No difference in OS was found between patients with > 20 brain metastases and patients with a single metastasis (p = 0.61). Compared to the single tumor cohort, where 217 of 278 (78.06%) patients had no recorded local tumor progression, patients with > 20 brain metastases had a local tumor control rate of 76.92% (p = 0.25). Patients with > 20 tumors had a significantly higher rate of distant tumor development (69.2%) after SRS compared to patients with single tumors (35.3%; **p = 0.024). No significant difference of ARE rate was found.
Conclusion: In this volume matched multi-center study, patients with > 20 tumors showed comparable OS and LTC outcomes compared to patients with single tumors. The number of brain metastases should not be used as a criteria to exclude patients from receiving SRS.
Keywords: Adverse radiation effects; Non-small cell lung cancer; Stereotactic radiosurgery.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Dr. L. Dade Lunsford is an AB Elekta stockholder and Insightec consultant. Dr. Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis is a consultant for Stryker Corp, Hemerion Therapeutics, NICO Corp, Integra, Synaptive Medical, and True Digital Surgery. Dr. Matthew Shepard is a consultant at GT Medical Technologies Inc. All other authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Details of previous presentation: The material has not been previously presented. Details of previous publication: The material has not been previously published. Informed consent: This study was approved and patient consent was waived by the institutional review board (IRB).
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249 - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A, Cancer Statistics (2021) CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7–33
-
- Linskey ME, Andrews DW, Asher AL et al (2010) The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:45–68 - PubMed
-
- Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR et al (2009) Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:1037–1044 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
