Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0323738.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323738. eCollection 2025.

Defining and measuring acceptability of surgical interventions: A scoping review

Sophie James  1 , Jennie Lister  1 , Joy Adamson  1 , Catherine Hewitt  1 , Antonina Yakimova  1 , Andrew Mott  1 , Helen Fulbright  2 , Catriona McDaid  1
Affiliations

Defining and measuring acceptability of surgical interventions: A scoping review

Sophie James et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Acceptability, in the context of healthcare interventions is a frequently used term, including in evaluations of surgical interventions. This reflects the importance of the concept to all stakeholders and significance to designing, implementing and evaluating interventions. Despite this, definitions and measurement of acceptability are not standardised, and acceptability is often poorly conceptualised. The aim of this scoping review was to identify how studies define, measure and report the acceptability of a surgical intervention.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE; Embase:APA PsycInfo; EBHealth-KSR Evidence; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; International HTA database; ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was conducted for the period January 2000 to November 2023. No language limits were applied.

Results: Sixty-seven studies from 25 countries were included. The majority of studies (n = 60; 90%) did not provide a definition of acceptability. Various methods were used to collect data on acceptability, most frequently a questionnaire (n = 36; 54%), followed by qualitative interviews (n = 16; 24%). Thirty-three studies (49%) reported acceptability of the surgical intervention received to patients, nine (13%) reported hypothetical acceptability of the surgical intervention to patients, four (6%) reported acceptability to both patients and surgeons, and four studies (6%) the acceptability to surgeons alone.

Conclusion: Studies assessing acceptability of a surgical intervention tended not to provide a definition of acceptability and demonstrated a lack of clarity in the use of acceptability in the context of surgical interventions. There was substantial variability in how and when acceptability was measured and from which perspective. Further research is required to explore the most appropriate approaches to address variability and promote a more consistent conceptualisation and accurate measurement of acceptability in evaluations of surgical interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for reviews which included searches of databases and registers.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Clinical speciality of the surgical intervention in the included studies.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Data collection methods used to obtain information about acceptability of the surgical intervention in the included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Perski O, Short C. Acceptability of digital health interventions: embracing the complexity. Transl Behav Med. 2021;11(7):1473–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson S, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby J. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kazdin AE. Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980;13(2):259–73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al.. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms