Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3:14:e65515.
doi: 10.2196/65515.

Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Sié Mathieu Aymar Romaric Da  1   2 , Maxime Sasseville  1   2 , Marie-Soleil Hardy  1   2 , Idrissa Beogo  3 , Amédé Gogovor  4 , Samira Amil  2 , Achille R Yameogo  1   2 , Frédéric Bergeron  2 , Anik Giguere  4 , Annie LeBlanc  4 , James Plaisimond  1   2 , Carole Rivard-Lacroix  5 , Marie-Pierre Gagnon  1   2
Affiliations

Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Sié Mathieu Aymar Romaric Da et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: The aging of the population is a major issue in Canada, particularly in Quebec. For people older than the age of 65 years, aging is often associated with both mild and severe cognitive impairment. The management of these disorders increases the pressure on health care systems. Digital health technologies could be used to promote the cognitive health of older people living with cognitive disorders. However, to reap the full benefits of using digital health technologies, it is critical that older people with cognitive disorders engage with these technologies. A dose-response relationship has been demonstrated between the level of engagement with digital health technologies and the effectiveness of interventions in older people. It is thus important to understand how older people with cognitive impairment engage with digital health technologies and how this engagement can influence the success of digital health interventions.

Objective: This study aims to describe how the engagement of older adults with cognitive impairment with digital health technologies is conceptualized and assessed, and how this engagement relates to the effectiveness of digital health interventions.

Methods: We will use the scoping review method outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. We will apply a systematic approach following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist to ensure reproducibility of the scoping review. A search strategy, created with a medical information specialist, will be applied to MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, without time restrictions. Two reviewers will independently select titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data extraction will be conducted by the research team and validated by a senior member, resolving disagreements by consensus or a third party if necessary. Descriptive analyses will be done using concept mapping for a narrative synthesis of the results by themes related to the research questions.

Results: The development of the search strategy and the completion of the selection phases of the review were completed in July 2024. Data extraction and analysis began in August 2024, and results are expected to be available in November 2024.

Conclusions: The results of this scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the different conceptualizations of engagement with digital health technologies in older people with cognitive impairment, as well as the tools to measure it. This will contribute to a better understanding of the relationships between levels of engagement and the effectiveness of digital health interventions in older people living with neurocognitive disorders.

International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/65515.

Keywords: cognitive disorders; digital health technologies; engagement; older adults; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. In the midst of high job vacancies and historically low unemployment, Canada faces record retirements from an aging labour force: number of seniors aged 65 and older grows six times faster than children 0-14. Statistics Canada. 2022. Apr 27, [2024-04-23]. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220427/dq220427a-eng.htm .
    1. Tsai YI, Beh J, Ganderton C, Pranata A. Digital interventions for healthy ageing and cognitive health in older adults: a systematic review of mixed method studies and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04617-3. https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-023-04617-3 10.1186/s12877-023-04617-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parcours de soins des patients présentant un trouble neurocognitif associée à la maladie d'Alzheimer ou à une maladie apparentée. Troubles cognitifs et troubles neurocognitifs [Article in French] Haute Autorité de Santé. 2018. [2024-04-27]. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-05/fiche_1_tro... .
    1. Dementia in Canada: summary. Canadian Institute for Health Information. [2024-04-23]. https://www.cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/dementia-in-canada-summary .
    1. Dementia in long-term care. Canadian Institute for Health Information. [2024-07-23]. https://www.cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/dementia-care-across-the-healt... .

LinkOut - more resources