Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 3:13:e67250.
doi: 10.2196/67250.

Technology-Assisted Motor-Cognitive Training Among Older Adults: Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yaqin Li  1 , Yaqian Liu  1 , Angela Ym Leung  1 , Jed Montayre  1
Affiliations
Review

Technology-Assisted Motor-Cognitive Training Among Older Adults: Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yaqin Li et al. JMIR Serious Games. .

Abstract

Background: Age-related physiological changes in older adults involve a rapid decline in motor exercise ability; some older adults may also experience difficulties in maintaining focus, memory loss, and a decline in reaction time, which consequently impair their ability to perform dual tasks. Motor-cognitive training (MCT) refers to a blend of motor activity and cognitive training that occurs simultaneously and can assist older adults in enhancing their physical function, cognitive abilities, and dual-task performance. In recent years, the use of technology for delivering MCT has become increasingly popular in research. This has been achieved through various technologies that simplify MCT for older adults.

Objective: This study aimed to systematically examine the feasibility and effectiveness studies on technology-assisted MCT among older adults.

Methods: This rapid review was conducted following the updated PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 standards, and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews reporting guideline. Four databases were searched, including CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus, from January 2013 to March 2025. Search strategies were constructed based on three main topics: (1) older adults, (2) MCT, and (3) technology. Inclusion criteria followed the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and study design framework as follows: older adults (population); technology-assisted MCT (intervention); standard treatment control, active control, partial intervention control, placebo control, and dose-response control (comparator); various measures of physical, cognitive, and dual-task performance (outcome); and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pilot RCTs (study design). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied for quality appraisal of the included studies. The feasibility of the included studies was assessed using completion rates and attrition rates. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups, while narrative methods were used to categorize and synthesize their effectiveness.

Results: In total, 20 studies were included, comprising 16 RCTs and 4 pilot RCTs, most of which were conducted within a 6-week period. Each session typically lasted between 10 and 30 minutes and was held 2 to 3 times per week. Feasibility analysis showed that technology-assisted MCT was generally feasible. While the workload was high, the perceived usability was also high, with a considerable amount of positive feedback and very few reported adverse events. The types of MCT varied in terms of components, duration, and frequency. The majority of studies (18/20, 90%) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in physical, cognitive, and dual-task performance because of technology-assisted MCT.

Conclusions: The feasibility of technology-assisted MCT among older adults was high regardless of the perceived high workload, and most studies showed statistical effectiveness in improving physical, cognitive, and dual-task performance.

Trial registration: Open Science Foundation (OSF) Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SRCQ; https://osf.io/5srcq.

Keywords: motor-cognitive; older adults; performance; randomized controlled trials; technology-assisted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flowchart. RCT: randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n=15; intention-to-treat) as percentages.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n=5; per protocol) as percentages.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Global issues: population. United Nations. [2025-05-14]. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population .
    1. Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, Lindenberger U. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x.9/1/1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zanker J, Duque G. Osteoporosis in older persons: old and new players. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):831–40. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15716. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnsley J, Buckland G, Chan PE, Ong A, Ramos AS, Baxter M, Laskou F, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Patel HP. Pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis: challenges for clinical practice in older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;33(4):759–73. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01817-y. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33742387 10.1007/s40520-021-01817-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Claflin DR, Brooks SV. Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007 Nov;34(11):1091–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04752.x. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75382 CEP4752 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources