Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 3:e13960.
doi: 10.1111/obr.13960. Online ahead of print.

Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management

Affiliations
Review

Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management

Diana Sherifali et al. Obes Rev. .

Abstract

Introduction: To co-create comprehensive targets for obesity management, we need to understand the genesis and current use of percent weight loss targets in research. The goals of our scoping review are to (1) synthesize the literature on percent weight loss targets for adults with obesity and (2) discuss the percent weight loss targets in context with their health benefits.

Methods: We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for English language, pharmaceutical, and/or behavioral intervention studies in adults with obesity where the explicit aim of the study was weight reduction defined as a percent of body weight. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data including study characteristics.

Results: From 16,164 abstracts, we included 30 citations which were mostly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 17) or quasi-experimental studies (n = 12) published between 1992 and 2024. Most of the studies had target weight loss goals between 3% and 10% of body weight (n = 28), while n = 2 had body weight loss goals of 15% or 30%. The proportion of participants who met the percent weight loss target ranged from 5.9% (nutrition only study) to 85% (pharmaceutical study). The studies reported different reasons for targeting a percentage of weight loss such as disease-specific outcomes, reduced risk of disease, or patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusion: Percent weight loss targets were based on similar research and were often not feasible nor sustainable for most participants. The design of these interventions and evaluation of obesity management would benefit from more patient-focused parameters which could help to co-design comprehensive targets for research and practice.

Keywords: obesity management; percent body weight; scoping review; target; weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. D. B. Horn, J. P. Almandoz, and M. Look, “What Is Clinically Relevant Weight Loss for Your Patients and How Can It Be Achieved? A Narrative Review,” Postgraduate Medicine 134, no. 4 (2022): 359–375, https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2022.2051366.
    1. F. Magkos, E. Nikonova, R. Fain, S. Zhou, T. Ma, and W. Shanahan, “Effect of Lorcaserin on Glycemic Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” Obesity (Silver Spring) 25, no. 5 (2017): 842–849, https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21798.
    1. J. P. H. Wilding, R. L. Batterham, S. Calanna, et al., “Once‐Weekly Semaglutide in Adults With Overweight or Obesity,” New England Journal of Medicine Mar 18, 384, no. 11 (2021): 989–1002, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183.
    1. V. Yumuk, C. Tsigos, M. Fried, et al., “European Guidelines for Obesity Management in Adults,” Obesity Facts 8, no. 6 (2015): 402–424, https://doi.org/10.1159/000442721.
    1. C. W. le Roux, A. Astrup, K. Fujioka, et al., “3 Years of Liraglutide Versus Placebo for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction and Weight Management in Individuals With Prediabetes: A Randomised, Double‐Blind Trial,” Lancet 389, no. 10077 (2017): 1399–1409, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(17)30069‐7.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources