Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management
- PMID: 40461407
- DOI: 10.1111/obr.13960
Missing the Target: A Scoping Review of the Use of Percent Weight Loss for Obesity Management
Abstract
Introduction: To co-create comprehensive targets for obesity management, we need to understand the genesis and current use of percent weight loss targets in research. The goals of our scoping review are to (1) synthesize the literature on percent weight loss targets for adults with obesity and (2) discuss the percent weight loss targets in context with their health benefits.
Methods: We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for English language, pharmaceutical, and/or behavioral intervention studies in adults with obesity where the explicit aim of the study was weight reduction defined as a percent of body weight. Reviewers screened citations and extracted data including study characteristics.
Results: From 16,164 abstracts, we included 30 citations which were mostly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 17) or quasi-experimental studies (n = 12) published between 1992 and 2024. Most of the studies had target weight loss goals between 3% and 10% of body weight (n = 28), while n = 2 had body weight loss goals of 15% or 30%. The proportion of participants who met the percent weight loss target ranged from 5.9% (nutrition only study) to 85% (pharmaceutical study). The studies reported different reasons for targeting a percentage of weight loss such as disease-specific outcomes, reduced risk of disease, or patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusion: Percent weight loss targets were based on similar research and were often not feasible nor sustainable for most participants. The design of these interventions and evaluation of obesity management would benefit from more patient-focused parameters which could help to co-design comprehensive targets for research and practice.
Keywords: obesity management; percent body weight; scoping review; target; weight loss.
© 2025 The Author(s). Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. PMID: 30354042 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthful Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Known Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. PMID: 29364620 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009. PMID: 23074526 Free PMC article.
References
-
- D. B. Horn, J. P. Almandoz, and M. Look, “What Is Clinically Relevant Weight Loss for Your Patients and How Can It Be Achieved? A Narrative Review,” Postgraduate Medicine 134, no. 4 (2022): 359–375, https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2022.2051366.
-
- F. Magkos, E. Nikonova, R. Fain, S. Zhou, T. Ma, and W. Shanahan, “Effect of Lorcaserin on Glycemic Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” Obesity (Silver Spring) 25, no. 5 (2017): 842–849, https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21798.
-
- J. P. H. Wilding, R. L. Batterham, S. Calanna, et al., “Once‐Weekly Semaglutide in Adults With Overweight or Obesity,” New England Journal of Medicine Mar 18, 384, no. 11 (2021): 989–1002, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183.
-
- V. Yumuk, C. Tsigos, M. Fried, et al., “European Guidelines for Obesity Management in Adults,” Obesity Facts 8, no. 6 (2015): 402–424, https://doi.org/10.1159/000442721.
-
- C. W. le Roux, A. Astrup, K. Fujioka, et al., “3 Years of Liraglutide Versus Placebo for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction and Weight Management in Individuals With Prediabetes: A Randomised, Double‐Blind Trial,” Lancet 389, no. 10077 (2017): 1399–1409, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(17)30069‐7.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous