Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk
- PMID: 40461961
- PMCID: PMC12135277
- DOI: 10.1186/s12873-025-01253-5
Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk
Abstract
Background: Older adults are a growing demographic in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide, yet traditional triage systems often fail to account for their unique risks, leading to under-triage and adverse outcomes. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool offers a pragmatic approach to enhance risk stratification, but its integration into ED triage systems remains underexplored.
Methods: This prospective single-center observational cohort study assessed older patients (≥ 65 years) using both the standard ED triage system and the ISAR scale. After a 30-day follow-up, triage levels were retrospectively adjusted upward by one level for patients with ISAR scores ≥ 2. The predictive accuracy of the revised triage system was compared to the original system using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: Among 973 patients completing follow-up, 38.1% had an ISAR score ≥ 2. Older patients (≥ 75 years) were more likely to be classified as high risk and had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. The revised triage system slightly improved discriminative ability in patients aged ≥ 65 years (AUC 0.697 to 0.714), with stable performance maintained in those aged ≥ 75 years (AUC 0.703). Sensitivity declined slightly, while specificity improved.
Conclusion: Integrating ISAR into ED triage modestly enhanced the identification of older patients at risk for short-term adverse outcomes, particularly among those aged ≥ 65 years. These findings support the value of incorporating geriatric screening into routine triage to enable more tailored risk stratification. Further studies are needed to evaluate implementation feasibility across different healthcare settings and to inform integration into routine practice.
Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Keywords: Emergency department triage; Geriatric emergency care; Older patients; Risk stratification.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Central Hospital of Wuhan (Ethics approval number: WHZXKYL2024-033). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians prior to their inclusion in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparative Analysis of Frailty Scales in Emergency Department: Highlighting the Strengths of the Triage Frailty and Comorbidity Tool.J Emerg Nurs. 2025 Jan;51(1):135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.012. Epub 2024 Nov 5. J Emerg Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39503691
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting mortality and intensive care needs in geriatric trauma patients: A ROC analysis of frailty and trauma scoring systems.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 21;51(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02924-5. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025. PMID: 40691669
-
[Usefulness of scoring risk for adverse outcomes in older patients with the Identification of Seniors at Risk scale and the Triage Risk Screening Tool: a meta-analysis].Emergencias. 2017 Feb;29(1):49-60. Emergencias. 2017. PMID: 28825270 Spanish.
-
The role of vital signs in predicting mortality risk in elderly patients visiting the emergency department.BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01307-8. BMC Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40750848 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lindner G, Woitok BK. Emergency department overcrowding: analysis and strategies to manage an international phenomenon. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2021/03/. 2021;133(5–6):229–33. 10.1007/s00508-019-01596-7. - PubMed
-
- Savioli G, Ceresa IF, Bressan MA, et al. Geriatric population triage: the risk of Real-Life Over- and Under-Triage in an overcrowded ED: 4- and 5-Level triage systems compared: the CREONTE (Crowding and R E organization National TriagE) study. J Pers Med Feb. 2024;9(2). 10.3390/jpm14020195. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kuriyama A, Urushidani S, Nakayama T. Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity. Emerg Med J Nov. 2017;34(11):703–10. 10.1136/emermed-2016-206295. - PubMed
-
- Chippa V, Roy K. Geriatric Cognitive Decline and Polypharmacy. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2025, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2025. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources