Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 20:16:1576815.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576815. eCollection 2025.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch between donor-recipient on acute rejection in liver transplantation using next-generation sequencing: a single-center study

Affiliations

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch between donor-recipient on acute rejection in liver transplantation using next-generation sequencing: a single-center study

Genjie Lu et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch on acute rejection (AR) in liver transplantation (LT) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effect of donor-recipient mismatch at the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1 loci on AR in LT.

Methods: In total, 92 patients who underwent LT were selected for investigation from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2024, and the donors of these patients were also from the same hospital. All donor and recipient specimens were genotyped via next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the 11 HLA loci. The patients were divided into AR and non-AR groups according to whether AR occurred after LT.

Results: A total of 12 cases (13.04%) experienced AR after LT. The proportion of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was lower in the AR group than that in the non-AR group (P<0.05), while the proportion of split LT and mortality within 1 year after transplantation was higher in the AR group than in the non-AR group (P<0.05). Compared with the non-AR group, the AR group had a significantly higher proportion of high-mismatch DQB1 (2 vs. 0-1) and DRB1+DQB1 (4 vs. 0-3) (P<0.05) at the allele level, and other mismatches of a single locus and different combinations of the 11 HLA loci had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). However, neither high-mismatch DQB1 nor high-mismatch DRB1+DQB1 at the allele level was an independent risk factor for AR after adjustment for chronic HBV infection, LT operative procedures, and immunosuppressive regimen using bootstrapping [odds ratio (OR): 0.203, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000-1.300, P=0.067; OR: 0.404, 95% CI: 0.000-2.625, P=0.172, respectively].

Conclusion: In this preliminary study, no correlation between HLA mismatch at the allele level and post-transplant AR episodes was found.

Keywords: acute rejection; human leukocyte antigen; liver transplantation; mismatch; next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of overall survival (OS) between the AR and non-AR groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of AR in liver transplant patients, according to donor-recipient mismatch between various combinations of 11 HLA loci. Class II includes HLA-DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1. The 11 loci include HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1.

Similar articles

References

    1. Feng S, Roll GR, Rouhani FJ, Sanchez Fueyo A. The future of liver transplantation. Hepatology. (2024) 80:674–97. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000873 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mugaanyi J, Tong J, Lu C, Mao S, Huang J, Lu C. Risk factors for acute rejection in liver transplantation and its impact on the outcomes of recipients. Transplant Immunol. (2023) 76:101767. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101767 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong YJ, Singh N, Sanchez-Fernandez N, Montano-Loza AJ. Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Conference: towards better clinical care in transplant hepatology. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. (2024) 13:512–5. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mergental H, Laing RW, Kirkham AJ, Perera M, Boteon YL, Attard J, et al. . Transplantation of discarded livers following viability testing with normothermic machine perfusion. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:2939. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16251-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Leeuwen OB, de Vries Y, Fujiyoshi M, Nijsten MWN, Ubbink R, Pelgrim GJ, et al. . Transplantation of high-risk donor livers after ex situ resuscitation and assessment using combined hypo- and normothermic machine perfusion: A prospective clinical trial. Ann surg. (2019) 270:906–14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003540 - DOI - PubMed