Comparative outcome study of the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
- PMID: 40464907
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-025-06569-2
Comparative outcome study of the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Management of Open tibia shaft fractures utilizing the conventional protocol is usually cumbersome; involves several operative procedures and longer periods of hospitalization. The use of external fixators for the definitive management of open tibia shaft fractures has been promising. The Ilizarov frame and linear rail system (LRS) are the commonly used options since they are comparable in efficacy and adaptable in the management of open tibia shaft fractures. The study objective is to determine and compare for any significant difference in the mean radiological union time, union rate, bone outcomes and functional outcomes noted in the management of patients with open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system (LRS) in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Research method: This is a prospective study involving thirty (30) patients of both sexes, divided into two (2) groups; Ilizarov frame fixator group and LRS group. All patients had open tibia shaft fractures of Gustillo-Anderson Class (GA II- IIIB). The radiological union time was derived from the length of time in the fixator during which radiological union was confirmed, while the bone and functional outcomes were assessed using the ASAMI criteria.
Result: Union was achieved in 27 participants while three (2 in LRS group and 1 in Ilizarov group) had non-union. The union rate was 86.7% for the LRS group and 93.3% for the Ilizarov group. The mean radiological union time was 6.5 ± 1.8 months in the LRS group and 6.4 ± 2.1 months in the Ilizarov group. The bone outcomes showed that in the LRS group, 66.7% had excellent, 20% had good and 13.3% had poor outcomes while the Ilizarov group had 53.3% excellent, 40% good and 6.7% poor outcomes. The functional outcome showed that in the LRS group 53.3% had excellent, 40% good and 6.7% fair outcomes while in the Ilizarov group, 40% excellent, 46,7% good and 13.3% fair outcomes. There is no significant difference noted in the mean radiological union time, union rate, bone and functional outcomes in the management of these open tibia shaft fractures using the two fixators under review.
Conclusion: The study has re-iterated the fact that the Ilizarov frame fixator and the LRS are quite versatile tools in the armamentarium of the orthopaedic surgeon for managing open tibia shaft fractures.
Keywords: Illizarov; Linear rail system; Open fracture; Open tibial fracture.
© 2025. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Management of Unique Complex Long Bone Fractures by Gunshot Injuries with Linear Rail System.Ann Afr Med. 2025 Jul 1;24(3):562-566. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_143_23. Epub 2025 May 30. Ann Afr Med. 2025. PMID: 40445311 English, French.
-
Mid to Long-Term Outcomes of Grade III-B Open Tibial Fractures Definitively Managed With a Circular Frame: A 13-Year Prospective Database Study at a Major Trauma Center.J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):447-451. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002841. J Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39007662
-
The treatment of infected tibial nonunion by bone transport using the Ilizarov external fixator and a systematic review of infected tibial nonunion treated by Ilizarov methods.Acta Orthop Belg. 2014 Sep;80(3):426-35. Acta Orthop Belg. 2014. PMID: 26280618
-
Comparative study of the results of compound tibial shaft fractures treated by Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators.Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(6):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.08.006. Chin J Traumatol. 2015. PMID: 26917026 Clinical Trial.
-
Distraction osteogenesis versus induced membrane technique for infected tibial non-unions with segmental bone loss: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available studies.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):705-721. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02375-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024. PMID: 37921889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nicoll EA (1974) Closed and open management of tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976–2007 105:144
-
- Wanjema S, Oluoch R, Ayumba BR et al (2020) Tibial diaphyseal fractures: aetiology, morphology and treatment in adult patients at Moi teaching and referral hospital, eldoret, Kenya. East Afr Orthop J 14:8–13
-
- Ibeanusi SEB, Ekere AU (2007) Epidemiology of open tibial fractures in a teaching hospital. P H Med J 1:156–160. https://doi.org/10.4314/phmedj.v1i3.38876 - DOI
-
- Elachi IC, Okunola BB, Yongu WT et al (2014) Motorcycle-related injuries at a university teaching hospital in North central Nigeria. Niger Med J J Niger Med Assoc 55:452–455. https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.144693 - DOI
-
- Madubueze CC, Chukwu COO, Omoke NI et al (2011) Road traffic injuries as seen in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Int Orthop 35:743–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1080-y - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical