Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE)
- PMID: 40465577
- PMCID: PMC12136299
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324515
Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE)
Abstract
Background: Lacerations are the most common traumatic reason for children to visit an emergency department (ED), accounting for almost half of all procedures performed. Children experience considerable distress during laceration repair, despite routine application of local anesthetic. Pharmacologic anxiolysis may mitigate the negative practice of forcefully restraining a child, however, evidence for the most effective agent is lacking. We aim to determine the most effective anxiolytic agent for laceration repair in children.
Methods: This is a multicentre, phase III, three-arm, adaptive, randomized, open-label, trial. We will include children 2-12 years with a single laceration requiring suture repair in the ED. Participants will be randomized to receive intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) 3 mcg/kg, intranasal midazolam (INM) 0.4 mg/kg, or inhaled 50% nitrous oxide (N2O). The primary outcome is the weighted mean anxiolysis score using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised (OSBD-R) from initial positioning to tying of the last suture. Secondary outcomes include need for additional anxiolytic, need for physical restraint, adverse events (AEs), and delayed maladaptive behaviors. The primary analysis will be conducted by intention-to-treat. Results will report posterior means, standard deviations (SDs), and 95% high density posterior credible intervals for Total Distress Score on the OSBD-R. We will rank interventions based on the probability that an intervention is superior (Pbest) and the Surface Area Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) to indicate relative anxiolytic efficacy. The mean difference in Total Distress Score and secondary outcomes will be estimated using Bayesian models.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval will be obtained from institutional review boards of the participating sites. Informed consent will be obtained from guardians of all participants in addition to assent from all participants. Study data will be submitted for publication.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05383495.
Copyright: © 2025 Poonai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- O’Donnell M, Williams J. Children’s emergency department services: setting the stage for tiers development. Child Health BC. 2016. https://www.childhealthbc.ca/sites/default/files/20-07-01-ed-tiers-setti...
-
- Kumar K, Ali S, Sabhaney V, Trottier E, Drendel A, Bhatt M. Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: a survey of pediatric emergency providers in Canada. CJEM. 2022;24(1):75–83. - PubMed
