A Concordance Study among 26 NGS Laboratories Participating in the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Clinical Trial
- PMID: 40465838
- PMCID: PMC12284871
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2188
A Concordance Study among 26 NGS Laboratories Participating in the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Clinical Trial
Abstract
Purpose: NCI selected a network of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories performing routine next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor testing to identify patients for the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial. This large network provided a unique opportunity to compare variant detection and reporting between a wide range of testing platforms.
Experimental design: Twenty-eight NGS assays from 26 laboratories within the NCI-MATCH Network, including the NCI-MATCH central laboratory (CL) and 11 commercial and 14 academic designated laboratories (DL), were used for this study. DNA from eight cell lines and two clinical samples were sequenced. Pairwise comparisons in variant detection and reporting between each DL and CL were performed for single-nucleotide variant, insertion and deletion, and copy-number variant classes.
Results: We observed high concordance in variant detection between CL and DL for single-nucleotide variants and insertions and deletions [average positive agreement (APA) > 95.4% for all pairwise comparisons] but lower concordance for variant reporting after analysis pipeline filtering. We observed much higher agreement between CL and assays using amplification as the target enrichment method (84.2% < APA ≤ 95.7%, average APA = 88.7%) than other assays using hybridization capture (69.7% < APA ≤ 93.8%, average APA = 77.4%) due to blacklisting of actionable variants in low complexity regions. For copy-number variant reporting, we observed high agreement (APA > 82%) except between CL and two assays (APA = 76.9% and 71.4%) due to differences in estimation of copy numbers. Notably, for all variants, differences in variant interpretation also contributed to reporting discrepancies.
Conclusions: This study indicates that different NGS tumor profiling tests currently in widespread clinical use achieve high concordance between assays in variant detection. For variant reporting, observed discrepancies are mainly introduced during the bioinformatic analysis.
©2025 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
A. John Iafrate reports receiving royalties from Invitae and being a scientific advisory board member for Kinnate, Repare, SequreDx and Paige.AI. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.
The views presented in this article are those of the authors and should not be viewed as official opinions or positions of the National Cancer Institute, NIH, or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References
-
- Conley BA and Doroshow JH, Molecular analysis for therapy choice: NCI MATCH. Semin Oncol, 2014. 41(3): p. 297–9. - PubMed
-
- Keegan A, et al. , Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next Generation Sequencing-Based Hematologic Malignancy Assays With Survey Material-Specific Differences in Variant Frequencies. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2020. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical