Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 4:17:e69470.
doi: 10.2196/69470.

Empowering Patients and Caregivers to Use Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision for Wound Monitoring: Nonrandomized, Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Affiliations

Empowering Patients and Caregivers to Use Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision for Wound Monitoring: Nonrandomized, Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Rose Raizman et al. J Particip Med. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic wounds affect 1%-2% of the global population, and pose significant health and quality-of-life challenges for patients and caregivers. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision (CV) technologies present new opportunities for enhancing wound care, particularly through remote monitoring and patient engagement. A digital wound care solution (DWCS) that facilitates wound tracking using AI was redesigned as a patient-facing mobile app to empower patients and caregivers to actively participate in wound monitoring and management.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and preliminary clinical outcomes of the Patient Connect app (Swift Medical Inc) in enabling patients and caregivers to remotely capture and share wound data with health care providers.

Methods: A feasibility study was conducted at 2 outpatient clinics in Canada between May 2020 and February 2021. A total of 28 patients with chronic wounds were recruited and trained to use the Patient Connect app for wound imaging and secure data sharing with their care teams. Wound images and data were analyzed using AI models integrated into the app. Clinicians reviewed the data to inform treatment decisions during follow-up visits or remotely. Key metrics included app usage frequency, patient engagement, and wound closure rates.

Results: Participants captured a median of 13 wound images per wound, with images submitted every 8 days on average. The study cohort included patients with diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, pressure injuries, and postsurgical wounds. A median wound closure surface area closure of 80% (range 15-100) was achieved across all patients, demonstrating the app's clinical potential. Feedback from patients and clinicians highlighted during the feasibility testing support insight into the app's usability, data security features, and ability to enhance remote monitoring that need to be explored in further qualitative research.

Conclusions: The Patient Connect app effectively engaged patients and caregivers in chronic wound care, demonstrating feasibility and promising clinical outcomes. By enabling secure, remote wound monitoring through AI technology, the app has the potential to improve patient adherence, enhance care accessibility, and optimize clinical workflows. Future studies should focus on evaluating its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and broader applicability in diverse health care settings.

Keywords: AI; artificial intelligence; computer vision; diabetic foot ulcer; mobile phone; patient engagement; wound care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Patient Connect is a software product of Swift Medical Inc. RDJF, SCW, and HTM are current employees of Swift Medical, and JLRG is a former employee of Swift Medical Inc. None declared by the other authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. A simulated wound is used to illustrate the difference between the patient-facing mobile app and the clinician mobile apps.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. A case series of a postoperative wound. First image on the left was captured by the clinician. Then the patient was taught to capture images and a second image the same day was documented. The 2 images on the right half show follow up monitoring submitted by the patient as the wound closed.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. A case series of a hard-to-heal wound on the sacrum imaged by a caregiver during the patient journey. Images have adequate lightening, focus, color correction, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based measurement is shown to the clinician monitoring the wound remotely.

References

    1. Bowers S, Franco E. Chronic wounds: evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2020 Feb 1;101(3):159–166. Medline. - PubMed
    1. Gottrup F. A specialized wound-healing center concept: importance of A multidisciplinary department structure and surgical treatment facilities in the treatment of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5A):38S–43S. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00303-9. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mustoe TA, O’Shaughnessy K, Kloeters O. Chronic wound pathogenesis and current treatment strategies: A unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jun;117(7 Suppl):35S–41S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225431.63010.1b. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Järbrink K, Ni G, Sönnergren H, et al. Prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds and related complications: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 8;5(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0329-y. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P, Vowden KR. Cohort study evaluating pressure ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK following initial presentation in the community: costs and outcomes. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 25;8(7):e021769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021769. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources