Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e093072.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093072.

Risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yin Liu et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Surgical site infections (SSI) after hysterectomy constitute significant postoperative complications, affecting patient recovery and healthcare costs. We conducted a systematic review of risk factors for SSI in patients undergoing hysterectomy.

Design: The current study conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to identify and summarise risk factors for SSI following hysterectomy.

Data sources: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through 1 November 2023.

Eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria were (1) population: female participants who had post-hysterectomy SSI; (2) intervention: hysterectomy surgeries; (3) comparators: the number of participants who had or had not post-hysterectomy SSI; (4) outcomes: the number of participants exposed and not exposed to the risk factors of SSI. The exclusion criteria were (1) non-English studies and (2) studies that provided insufficient data.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers conducted the screening process independently. Articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. For those that met the criteria, full-text papers were procured. Any discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved through discussion. The meta-analysis synthesised risk factors reported in ≥4 datasets via random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity, sensitivity (leave-one-out), publication bias (Egger's test/funnel plots) and subgroup analyses (incision types).

Results: Blood transfusion emerged as the largest risk factor (OR=2.55, 95% CI (1.84, 3.56)), followed by tumour presence (OR=2.23, 95% CI (1.86, 2.66)), obesity (OR=1.79, 95% CI (1.43, 2.23)), diabetes (OR=1.70, 95% CI (1.26, 2.29)) and tobacco use (OR=1.43, 95% CI (1.26, 1.63)). The ORs varied by incision type.

Conclusions: The study establishes blood transfusion, tumour presence, obesity, diabetes and tobacco use as significant risk factors for SSI after hysterectomy, with variations in risk evident across different incision types. The findings also suggest vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies as preferable alternatives to abdominal hysterectomy in mitigating SSI risk. Future research should aim for more granular data to untangle the interplay between comorbidities and further elucidate the differential risk across SSI types.

Keywords: Meta-Analysis; Risk Factors; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The funnel plots.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The forest plots for each risk factor (RF). REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SSI, surgical site infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Tobacco use subgroup forest plot between SSI types. REML, restricted maximum likelihood; RF, risk factor; SSI, surgical site infection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689–98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mukhopadhaya N, Manyonda IT. The hysterectomy story in the United Kingdom. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:40–1. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.109635. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. OECD . OECD health data 2003. Ottawa: 2004. pp. 5–7.
    1. Liu F, Pan Y, Liang Y, et al. The epidemiological profile of hysterectomy in rural Chinese women: a population-based study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan DM, Swenson CW, Streifel KM, et al. Surgical site infection following hysterectomy: adjusted rankings in a regional collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources