Understanding preferences of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease towards revascularisation and optimal medical therapy: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 40467319
- PMCID: PMC12142025
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094587
Understanding preferences of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease towards revascularisation and optimal medical therapy: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Introduction: The selection of the optimal treatment strategy remains one of the most challenging decisions in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularisation are two widely used treatments for managing CAD and can result in improved outcomes compared with medications alone. Current practice guidelines recommend revascularisation for multivessel CAD for most patients. However, there remains uncertainty about whether revascularisation or medical therapy is optimal for managing multivessel disease for many patients, especially, in the elderly and those living with multimorbidity. Also, there is limited understanding of patient preferences towards candidate treatment options for multivessel disease. This study aims to quantify and characterise heterogeneity in patient preferences towards treatment options for multivessel CAD.
Methods and analysis: We have designed and will administer a discrete choice experiment to elicit and quantify preferences of people with multivessel CAD towards revascularisation and optimal medical therapy for managing multivessel CAD. Multinomial logit mixed effects and hierarchical Bayes models will be used to model the association between the participants' choices and the attributes and their different levels. The relative importance of the attributes will be assessed using the size of coefficients and marginal rate of substitution (MRS), a measure of the willingness to accept a trade-off among different options. Heterogeneity in patient preferences will be evaluated using latent class analysis.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval for this study was granted by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. Findings from this study will inform the development of clinical decision support tool that integrates patient preferences with clinical risk information to support patient-care provider discussion about optimal treatment for multivessel CAD management.
Keywords: Coronary heart disease; Patient Participation; Patient-Centered Care; Surveys and Questionnaires.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 28;4(4):CD002902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002902.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28452408 Free PMC article.
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4. PMID: 21975733 Updated.
-
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11:CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4. PMID: 26730878 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34741536 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16153352
References
-
- Statistics Canada The ten leading causes of death. 2012. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2015001/article/14296-eng.htm Available.
-
- CIHI Inpatient Hospitalizations, Surgeries and Childbirth Indicators in 2013–2014. 2014. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/CAD_Hospitalization%20and%20Childbi... Available.
-
- Bassand J-P, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous