Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Sep;33(9):1212-1216.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01883-0. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

Constitutional copy number amplifications: rare or under-evaluated? Revisiting a 25-year-old cold case

Affiliations
Case Reports

Constitutional copy number amplifications: rare or under-evaluated? Revisiting a 25-year-old cold case

Eliana Salvo et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

We reanalyzed through a cytogenomics approach a case published 20 years ago, describing a girl with developmental delay and epilepsy. Karyotype and FISH analysis showed a de novo 2.3 Mb terminal inverted-duplication at 8q24.3. The interpretation was inconsistent with the absence of a more distal deletion as expected for distal inverted duplications, and it was inconceivable to highlight rearrangements smaller than 5-10 Mb at that time. Chromosomal microarray (CMA), optical genome mapping (OGM), and short-read whole genome sequencing (srWGS) identified a complex configuration at 8q24.3, which resembles events like chromoanasynthesis or DUP-TRP/INV-DUP (duplication-triplication/inverted-duplication), both characterized by clustered duplications and triplications, some of which are inverted. In the EBV-line genes located in the amplified regions were overexpressed. Despite a more precise definition of the imbalance, we were unable to provide a clear-cut explanation for the proband's clinical features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The studies involving humans were approved by the Comitato Etico dell’I.R.C.C.S. Eugenio Medea, sez. Scientifica dell’Associazione“La Nostra Famiglia. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual for the publication of any potentially identifiable data included in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Characterisation and interpretation of the 8q24.3 rearrangement.
A Cytogenetics and cytogenomics data: a Cut-out of chromosome 8 from a 400-banding karyotype; b CMA, RT-PCR and OGM of the 8q24.3 region showing nearly identical profiles. Numbers represent the log2 ratio (ADM2) of CMA and fractional copy numbers of OGM. B Genome sequencing details (a) NGS coverage plot (50x) of the 8q24.3 region (chr8:142,664,805-145,138,635, hg38) in control and the proband showing the duplicated (lighter blue box), triplicated (blue box), and amplified regions (darker blue boc) present in the patient only; quantification of copy number gains was based on the increased coverage in the plot (see Table S1). The three light gray boxes, present both in the control and the proband, indicate portions with poor coverage. b Schematic drawing of the order of the shattered fragments, according to hg38. In white, neutral copy number fragments (A, C, E, f, T); in red, deleted fragments (B, F, G); in light blue, the duplicated fragment D; in blue, the triplicated fragments H, h, I, L, S, and in dark blue, the amplified ones M, N, n, O, P, q, R, s. Left or right-oriented arrows represent discordant reads as they appear when aligned back to the reference genome (hg38). Note that hN junction one breakpoint lies within a clusted of segmental duplication (see Table S3) c Partial reconstruction of rearranged blocks; numbers within circles correspond to the breakpoint junctions verified by Sanger sequencing analysis (see Fig. S4). C The plausible replication-based mechanism of the 8q24.4 rearrangement. The schematic drawing indicates the 8q normal chromosome segmented according to the breakpoints (see panels B and Table S1). In the proposed replication pathway, arrows in the normal orientation (from left to right) or inverted (from right to left) denote the 8q24.3 regions shuffled on the patient’s chromosome 8q. The dashed lines indicate the movement from one replication fork to another, either in the normal or reverse orientation. At the bottom is a diagram of the final new rearranged chromosome 8 [rea(8q)], where the distal portion 8q24.3 presents inversions, deletions, duplication, triplication, and amplification. It is not certain where the block of fragments CfDO and DEnMNqLMNnOPQqRrST are inserted.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Genome view of the rearranged genomic region 8q24.3 spanning the distal 2.5 Mb of chromosome 8q (GRCh38/hg38).
a The colored horizontal lines represent the rearranged segments of our patient’s identified by genome sequencing. Each color indicates the copy number status: gray means normal copy numbers; red denotes deletions; light blue indicates duplication; blue represents triplication, and dark blue amplification. b Magnified view of the 8q24.3 DUP/TRIP/AMP. From top to bottom: UCSC genes (GRCh38/hg38); triplosensitivity genes (pTriplo) map: in red circles those having a probability of triplosensitivity (pTriplo ≥0.94) [17]; segmental duplications >1000 bps.

References

    1. Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Tenconi R, Pessina M, Pramparo T, Borgatti R, et al. A 2.3 Mb duplication of chromosome 8q24.3 associated with severe mental retardation and epilepsy detected by standard karyotype. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:586–91. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201369. - PubMed
    1. Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Poggi G, Raggi ME, Rossi E, Baroncini A, et al. Inverted duplications are recurrent rearrangements always associated with a distal deletion: description of a new case involving 2q. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8:597–603. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200509. - PubMed
    1. Pellestor F, Gatinois V. Chromoanasynthesis: another way for the formation of complex chromosomal abnormalities in human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1381–7. 10.1093/humrep/dey231. - PubMed
    1. Grochowski CM, Bengtsson JD, Du H, Lun MY, Mehaffey MG, Park K, et al. Inverted triplications formed by iterative template switches generate structural variant diversity at genomic disorder loci. Cell Genom. 2024;4:100590. 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuy J, Grochowski CM, Carvalho CMB, Lindstrand A. Complex genomic rearrangements: an underestimated cause of rare diseases. Trends Genet. 2022;38:1134–46. 10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.003. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types