Co-occurring microbial guilds in pig fecal microbiota: key drivers and effects on host performance
- PMID: 40468232
- PMCID: PMC12139276
- DOI: 10.1186/s12711-025-00979-x
Co-occurring microbial guilds in pig fecal microbiota: key drivers and effects on host performance
Abstract
Background: The pig gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem composed of microbial guilds that remain largely unexplored. Here we decomposed the pig fecal microbiota of two cohorts of 648 healthy Duroc pigs during the transition (n = 400) and growing finish (n = 248) periods in co-occurring bacterial guilds defined as pig enterosignatures (ES).
Results: Our results indicate that fecal microbial ecosystems can accurately be described by combinations of at least six ES, driven by the Prevotella (ES-Prev), Treponema (ES-Trep), Lactobacillus (ES-Lact), Clostridium (ES-Clost), Streptococcus (ES-Strep), and UBA2810 (ES-UBA2) genera. We observed a dynamic shift with age in the composition of ES, where ES-Prev, ES-Strep, and ES-Lact seem to be core components. Our results suggest partial genetic control by the host, with heritabilities of ES composition ranging from 0.24 to 0.36. Furthermore, our findings indicate that stress on the host is associated with assembly of the ES, decreasing ES-Lact abundance, and increasing prevalence of ES-Strep. We noted a positive association of ES-Prev with growth rate at 60-days, which later evolved to become negative, impacting feed efficiency during the growing period. Remarkably, a negative association of the abundance of ES-Lact with levels of hair cortisol was also found during this period.
Conclusions: Our findings provide novel insights into the pig gut microbiota and reveal novels associations with relevant porcine physiological and performance traits. Moreover, while the ES concept has proven valuable in dissecting microbial communities into assemblies of underlying microbial guilds, our results emphasize the relevance of customizing microbial interventions strategies based on the nutritional and health requirements at each stage of the porcine production cycle.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Animal care and experimental procedures were carried out following national and institutional guidelines for the Good Experimental Practices and were approved by the IRTA Ethical Committee. Consent to participate is not applicable in this study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science. 2012;336:1262–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
