Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 21:16:1568469.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1568469. eCollection 2025.

Primary succession of microbial communities in an aquifer from the Covey Hill formation in Quebec, Canada

Affiliations

Primary succession of microbial communities in an aquifer from the Covey Hill formation in Quebec, Canada

Samuel Beauregard-Tousignant et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Aquifers in the continental subsurface have long been exploited for their resources. However, given the technical difficulties in accessing recurring subsurface samples, their community diversity and temporal dynamics remain largely misunderstood. Here, we investigated the effects of time and organic and inorganic carbon concentration variation on primary succession of microbial communities belonging to the Bacteria and Eukaryote domains colonizing rock surfaces and groundwater from a shallow fractured sandstone aquifer with a very high concentration of organic carbon and low concentration of nitrogen compounds. We attempted to recreate its physicochemical environment in a triplicate bioreactor setup and let the communities grow for 24 days. The sessile and planktonic communities were sampled daily in independent experiments and identified based on their 16S (Bacteria) or 18S (Eukaryote) rRNA genes. Time was the parameter with the strongest correlation both with alpha and beta diversity. The primary succession of all communities seems to have been divided into two temporal phases: in the first phase, approximately the two 1st days, the variations in community composition and diversity were high. In the second phase, the variation is more progressive and lasted until the end of the experiment. As expected in an aquifer rich in organic carbon, bacteria were mostly heterotrophs, except in the first few days where there were some chemolithotrophs, and eukaryotes were heterotrophs or likely mixotrophs. Unexpectedly, the alpha diversity of the sessile and planktonic communities varied following similar patterns, but the planktonic ones varied with a wider amplitude. Regarding carbon's effect, organic and inorganic carbon concentration variation explained a much smaller proportion of the variation in alpha and beta diversity than expected. We believe this is due to its high concentration throughout the incubation and to the strong limiting effect of other factors such as nitrogen concentration and pH. The communities of both Bacteria and Eukaryotes were more active than expected and their temporal dynamics and interactions should be further investigated in varying carbon, nitrogen and other nutrient concentrations to better understand how different perturbations can affect subsurface communities and, subsequently, us.

Keywords: continental subsurface; genomics; microbial communities; microbial community succession; sessile microbes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Taxonomical identification of each community based on 16S/18S rRNA gene sequencing: (A) sessile Bacteria of E1; (B) sessile Eukaryotes of E1; (C) planktonic Bacteria of E2; and (D) planktonic Eukaryotes of E2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shared and unique ASV percentage through time between the sessile and planktonic communities of E1. (A) Bacteria; and (B) Eukaryotes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Combined effect of the shared trend of time and the individual effect of each bioreactor on the alpha diversity. (A) sessile bacteria of E1; (B) planktonic bacteria of E2; (C) sessile eukaryotes of E1; and (D) planktonic eukaryotes of E2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Shared trend of the effect of time on alpha diversity. The shaded area indicates the 0.95 credible interval. (A) sessile bacteria of E1; (B) planktonic bacteria of E2; (C) sessile eukaryotes of E1; and (D) planktonic eukaryotes of E2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
NMDS of the beta diversity of all communities based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. (A) sessile bacteria of E1; (B) sessile eukaryotes of E1; (C) planktonic bacteria of E2; and (D) planktonic eukaryotes of E2.

Similar articles

References

    1. Atencio B., Malavin S., Rubin-Blum M., Ram R., Adar E., Ronen Z. (2025). Site-specific incubations reveal biofilm diversity and functional adaptations in deep, ancient desert aquifers. Front. Microbiol. 16:1533115. 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1533115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartoš O., Chmel M., Swierczková I. (2024). The overlooked evolutionary dynamics of 16S rRNA revises its role as the “gold standard” for bacterial species identification. Sci. Rep. 14:9067. 10.1038/s41598-024-59667-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belmok A., de Almeida F. M., Rocha R. T., Vizzotto C. S., Tótola M. R., Ramada M. H. S., et al. . (2023). Genomic and physiological characterization of Novosphingobium terrae sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from Cerrado soil containing a mega-sized chromid. Brazil. J. Microbiol. 54, 239–258. 10.1007/s42770-022-00900-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Besemer K., Peter H., Logue J. B., Langenheder S., Lindström E. S., Tranvik L. J., et al. . (2012). Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities. ISME J. 6, 1459–1468. 10.1038/ismej.2011.205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callahan B. J., McMurdie P. J., Rosen M. J., Han A. W., Johnson A. J. A., Holmes S. P. (2016). DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources