The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH
- PMID: 4047004
Item in Clipboard
The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH
Miner Electrolyte Metab.
1985.
Abstract
In today's highly competitive biomedical research world, the applicant investigator should learn to present his or her research ideas clearly and prepared with a knowledge of the review process at the National Institutes of Health. It is hoped that the proposed guidelines in this article will enable experienced and not-so-experienced investigators to compete successfully in the field of biomedical research.
Similar articles
-
Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051. Cell. 2008. PMID: 18957192
-
Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):775-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74256. Acad Med. 2010. PMID: 20520024
-
Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.Fed Proc. 1977 Jul;36(8):2066-8. Fed Proc. 1977. PMID: 872944 No abstract available.
-
NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar;33(3):15-6. doi: 10.1038/laban0304-15. Lab Anim (NY). 2004. PMID: 15235618 Review. No abstract available.
-
Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?Lancet. 1998 Jul 25;352(9124):301-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11129-1. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9690424 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
National Library of Medicine resource grants: application and review.Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):157-68. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992. PMID: 1600425 Free PMC article. Review.