Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 May 13:rs.3.rs-6559185.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6559185/v1.

Beyond the Surface of Capacity Building: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Core Functions and Forms of Dissemination and Implementation Science Consultations

Kera Swanson  1 , Nicole A Stadnick  1 , Gregory A Aarons  1 , Lauren Brookman-Frazee  1 , Isaac Bouchard  2 , Zeying Du  1 , Anna Brubaker  1 , Carrie Geremia  1 , Kelli Cain  1 , Lilliana Conradi  1 , Marisa Sklar  1 , Clare Viglione  1 , Borsika Rabin  1
Affiliations

Beyond the Surface of Capacity Building: A Mixed-Methods Study of the Core Functions and Forms of Dissemination and Implementation Science Consultations

Kera Swanson et al. Res Sq. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: The number of Dissemination and Implementation Science (DIS) capacity building programs is increasing worldwide. These programs aim to enhance diverse DIS skills through a variety of activities. Our team's systematic review of DIS programs determined that DIS consultations were offered across 67% of programs, yet their specific roles in capacity development were not well defined. This mixed methods study aimed to identify and categorize the functions and forms of consultation activities across three DIS capacity building programs at the University of California San Diego that varied in content focus and infrastructure and then to map findings onto DIS competencies.

Methods: Consultation notes from the three programs were extracted for content analysis to identify discussion topics, DIS guidance provided, and resources shared. Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT Plus) facilitated content analyses with multiple rounds of validation from program consultants to re ne and finalize themes. Themes were categorized into consultation functions and forms. Forms were mapped onto DIS competencies and a gap analysis was conducted to identify areas for improvement. Program metrics were used to further contextualize findings.

Results: A total of 108 consultation notes were analyzed across the three programs. The most common types of support requested related to grant proposals (54%) and ongoing D&I projects (25%). Consultation discussion topics most frequently involved applying implementation science principles (55%) grant development (31%), guidance centered on DIS methods (47%), and study/project design (37%). Consultation guidance was most often aligned with intermediate-level DIS competencies (58%), primarily in the design and analysis and practice-based considerations domains.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the nature of DIS consultation services, particularly among those seeking support for grant proposals and ongoing implementation projects. Consultations primarily addressed intermediate-level competencies within the domains of design, analysis, and practice-based implementation strategies, indicating a clear opportunity to strengthen support for both foundational and advanced skill development. These results suggest the need for scalable consultation frameworks, improved tracking systems, and tiered training resources to optimize the reach and impact of DIS capacity-building efforts.

Keywords: Capacity Building; Consultation; Dissemination; Implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. DISC and IN STEP Consultation Outcomes – Project Status
Note: Percentages represent the proportion of respondents within each program (DISC: n=33; IN STEP: n=11) who reported each outcome. Raw values are not shown due to different sample sizes across programs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Norton WE, Lungeanu A, Chambers DA, Contractor N. Mapping the growing discipline of dissemination and implementation science in health. Scientometrics. 2017. Sep;112(3):1367–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proctor EK, Chambers DA. Training in dissemination and implementation research: a field-wide perspective. Transl Behav Med. 2017. Sep 1;7(3):624–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumann AA, Adams DR, Baldwin LM, Tabak RG, Malone S, Kepper MM, et al. A mapping review and critique of the literature on translation, dissemination, and implementation capacity building initiatives for different audiences. Implement Sci Commun. 2025. Apr 3;6(1):34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beidas R, Bennett I, Fleischer L, Day T, Meisel Z. Supporting implementation science capacity in a university setting. Implement Sci. 2015. Aug 14;10(1):A79.
    1. Brownson RC, Proctor EK, Luke DA, Baumann AA, Staub M, Brown MT, et al. Building capacity for dissemination and implementation research: one university’s experience. Implement Sci. 2017. Dec;12(1):104. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources