Double low-dose abdominopelvic CT for acute appendicitis: early exploratory analysis on image quality and diagnostic performance
- PMID: 40471255
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-05029-0
Double low-dose abdominopelvic CT for acute appendicitis: early exploratory analysis on image quality and diagnostic performance
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a standardized double low-dose CT (DLCT) protocol that simultaneously reduces both iodine contrast media (CM) dose and tube voltage, and to compare its image quality and diagnostic performance with a single low-dose CT (SLCT) protocol using fixed iodine dose and reduced tube voltage, representative of institutional low-radiation dose imaging practice in suspected acute appendicitis.
Methods: In this exploratory analysis of a prospective single-arm study, 49 participants aged 18-44 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute appendicitis underwent DLCT using automated kVp selection and a kVp- and weight-adjusted CM dosing protocol. This protocol targeted a 10% iodine dose reduction for every 10 kVp decrease from a reference standard of 0.521 g I/kg at 120 kVp. A historical control group of 53 patients with the same inclusion criteria, who had undergone SLCT using a fixed CM dose and low-kVp protocol (80-100 kVp) prior to study initiation, was retrospectively included. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality and appendiceal visibility) assessments were compared. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV) for acute appendicitis and alternative diagnoses, based on surgical findings, clinical follow-up, or an Alvarado score ≥ 7.
Results: DLCT significantly reduced iodine dose (0.383 ± 0.049 g I/kg vs. 0.589 ± 0.085 g I/kg; P < 0.001) while maintaining comparable image noise and appendiceal visibility. Although SNR and CNR were lower in the DLCT group, diagnostic performance including PPVs for acute appendicitis (63.6% vs. 72.7%) and alternative diagnoses (100% vs. 86.7%) did not significantly differ between groups.
Conclusion: An iodine dose-reducing DLCT protocol tailored to tube voltage and body weight is feasible in the ED setting and offers substantial CM dose saving without compromising diagnostic performance for acute appendicitis or alternative diagnoses.
Keywords: Appendicitis; Computed tomography; Contrast media; Iodine; Radiation dosage.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Application value of individualized tube voltage, contrast injection, and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V algorithm based on body mass index in renal computed tomography angiography for radiation and iodinated contrast dose reduction.Br J Radiol. 2024 Dec 1;97(1164):1971-1978. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae185. Br J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 39378417
-
Low-voltage (80-kVp) abdominopelvic computed tomography allows 60% contrast dose reduction in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:352-355. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 Jun 9. Clin Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29982133
-
Dual-layer detector CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis with a one-third iodine dose: image quality, radiation dose, and optimal monoenergetic settings.Clin Radiol. 2018 Dec;73(12):1058.e21-1058.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 17. Clin Radiol. 2018. PMID: 30237063
-
[The application of setting tube voltage and iodine delivery rate in weight-grouped for reducing the radiation and contrast medium dose in coronary CT angiography].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 12;104(10):751-757. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230728-01109. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38462355 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Individualized Scan Protocols in Abdominal Computed Tomography: Radiation Versus Contrast Media Dose Optimization.Invest Radiol. 2022 Jun 1;57(6):353-358. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000844. Invest Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34935651
References
-
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, et al. (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031150 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aschoff AJ, Catalano C, Kirchin MA, Krix M, Albrecht T. (2017) Low radiation dose in computed tomography: the role of iodine. Br J Radiol 90:20170079. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170079 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Seyal AR, Arslanoglu A, Abboud SF, Sahin A, Horowitz JM, Yaghmai V. (2015) CT of the Abdomen with Reduced Tube Voltage in Adults: A Practical Approach. RadioGraphics 35:1922–1939. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150048 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Cauteren T, Honoria Da Silva E, Van Gompel G, Kersemans V, Sermon K, de Mey J, et al. (2019) Iodine Dose of Administered Contrast Media Affects the Level of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage During Cardiac CT Scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:404–409. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20950 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mazloumi M, Van Gompel G, Kersemans V, de Mey J, Buls N. (2021) The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol 31:7540–7549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07763-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources