Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;99(9):3663-3672.
doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04094-0. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Impact of physical activity on ethoxy- and propoxypropanol human toxicokinetics in vivo

Affiliations

Impact of physical activity on ethoxy- and propoxypropanol human toxicokinetics in vivo

Hélène P De Luca et al. Arch Toxicol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Organic solvents such as propylene glycol ethers (PGEs) represents more than 20 different substances and are incorporated in thousands of commercial and professional products. Two PGEs commonly used in Europe and found mainly in cleaning and water-based paint products are propylene glycol ethyl ether (PGEE) and propylene glycol propyl ether (PGPE). Given their volatile properties, inhalation is the most common route of exposure. The aim of this study was to characterize human toxicokinetics following PGEE and PGPE inhalation exposure. The participants were exposed (4 h) at rest to a single PGE (between 15 and 35 ppm) under controlled conditions and blood, urine, and exhaled breath were collected. Our study shows that both PGEs were rapidly detected in blood (absorption rate: 0.01 µg/mL/h*ppm) and elimination was more important through urine (half-life: 1 h) than exhaled breath (half-life: 2 min). We also evaluated the impact of a moderate physical activity (30 min, 100 W) during exposure. A significant increase of blood absorption (absorption rate: 0.03 µg/mL/h*ppm) and internal dose (increase of 48%) was observed. Our results confirm that both PGEs are easily absorbed at rest and even faster with a moderate physical activity. The biomonitoring approach we have developed here allow the measurement of the "real" internal dose in workers handling these solvents. The existing occupational exposure limits do not consider workload, which may lead to their underestimation. Therefore, we recommend the use of biomonitoring for future studies and the consideration of physical workload for future exposure limits settings as an important parameter for risk assessment.

Keywords: Absorption; Activity; Chemical exposure; Elimination; Propylene glycol ethyl ether; Propylene glycol propyl ether.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: This non-clinical human study was approved by the Swiss Commission on Ethics in Human Research (Swissethics) (no. project 2022–01567). All participants signed a written informed consent approved by the CERVD before admitted into the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Exposure design for participants exposed to PGEE or PGPE vapors at rest (including three different air concentrations) and with physical activity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
External-internal exposure dose relationship curves in blood (µg(mL) over the time (minutes) following four hours inhalation exposure to PGEE or PGPE at rest. Each grey curve represents the data from one participant. Black curves are the average (± standard deviation) for all participants (n = 5). The large square represents the time in the exposure chamber. a PGEE concentrations in blood as a function of time for a 25 (●), 30 (▲) and a 35 (■) ppm exposure to PGEE vapors. b PGPE concentrations in blood as a function of time for a 15 (●), 20 (▲) and a 25 (■) ppm exposure to PGPE vapors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
External-internal exposure dose relationship curves in blood (µg(mL) over the time (minutes) following exposure at rest (■) or with physical activity (□). Each dotted line represents the data of one participant. Bold points are the average (± standard deviation) for all participants (n = 9). The large square represents the time in the exposure chamber (4 h). The grey rectangle represents the 30 min of physical activity. a Exposure sessions with 35 ppm of PGEE. b Exposure sessions with 25 ppm of PGPE
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
External-internal exposure dose relationship curves in urine (µg/mL) and exhaled breath (ppm) over the time (minutes) following four hours inhalation exposure to PGEE or PGPE at rest. Each grey points represent the data for one participant. Black points are the average (± standard deviation) for all participants (n = 5). The large square represents the time in the exposure chamber. Urinary (a) or exhaled breath (c) PGEE concentrations as a function of time for a 25 (●), 30 (▲) and a 35 (■) ppm exposure to PGEE vapors. Urinary (b) or exhaled breath (d) PGPE concentrations as a function of time for a 15 (●), 20 (▲) and a 25 (■) ppm exposure to PGPE vapors

References

    1. Aliverti A (2016) The respiratory muscles during exercise. Breathe 12(2):165–168. 10.1183/20734735.008116 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borgatta M, Hechon J, Wild P, Hopf NB (2021) Influence of collection and storage materials on glycol ether concentrations in urine and blood. Sci Total Environ 792:148196. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148196 - PubMed
    1. Borgatta M, Wild P, Hopf NB (2022) Blood absorption toxicokinetics of glycol ethers after inhalation: a human controlled study. Sci Total Environ 816:151637. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151637 - PubMed
    1. Brooke I, Cocker J, Delic JI, Payne M, Jones K, Gregg NC, Dyne D (1998) Dermal uptake of solvents from the vapour phase: an experimental study in humans. Ann Occup Hyg 42(8):531–540. 10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00064-7 - PubMed
    1. Burcham PC (2013) An introduction to toxicology. Springer