Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion
- PMID: 40471305
- DOI: 10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4
Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the 7F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) allows for smooth navigation and facilitates proximal flow control. However, this method may allow antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aims to identify predictors of antegrade flow during CAS with the common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 102 lesions treated with CAS using the 7F Optimo BGC and distal filter protection. The ICA flow pattern was assessed via contrast injection during CCA occlusion.
Results: Antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 22 lesions (22%). Compared with lesions where ICA flow control (stagnation or reverse flow) was achieved, the external carotid artery (ECA) diameter was significantly larger (4.4 ± 0.7 mm vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001), and the minimum lesion diameter was significantly larger (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.44-16.1; p = 0.01) and an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.08-9.09; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of antegrade flow. High-intensity spots in postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of ischemic events were not significantly different between both groups.
Conclusions: Lesions with a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm or an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm may exhibit antegrade ICA flow with BGC regardless of CCA occlusion, suggesting that an additional distal filter may help reduce embolic risk.
Keywords: Antegrade flow; Balloon guide catheter; Carotid artery stenting; Distal filter protection; Flow reversal.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: K. Harada, K. Arakawa and M. Kajihara declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1121-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3487-y. Epub 2018 Feb 16. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018. PMID: 29453735
-
Carotid artery stenting using a 7 French Optimo balloon guide catheter combined with a distal filter.Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun;31(3):339-343. doi: 10.1177/15910199231162493. Epub 2023 Jun 15. Interv Neuroradiol. 2025. PMID: 37322893 Free PMC article.
-
Hemodynamic conditions at the carotid bifurcation during protective common carotid occlusion.J Vasc Surg. 2001 Oct;34(4):577-80. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.119041. J Vasc Surg. 2001. PMID: 11668307
-
Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):1177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.019. Epub 2014 Sep 17. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25240544 Review.
-
Evidence overview: benefit of cerebral protection devices during carotid artery stenting.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Apr;58(2):170-177. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09848-7. Epub 2016 Dec 22. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017. PMID: 28004899 Review.
References
-
- Knappich C, Kuehnl A, Tsantilas P, Schmid S, Breitkreuz T, Kallmayer M, Zimmermann A, Eckstein HH. The use of embolic protection devices is associated with a lower stroke and death rate after carotid stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.032 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harada K, Morioka J, Higa T, Saito T, Fukuyama K. Significance of combining distal filter protection and a guiding catheter with temporary balloon occlusion for carotid artery stenting: clinical results and evaluation of debris capture. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26:929–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2012.04.022 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dargazanli C, Mahmoudi M, Cappucci M, Collemiche FL, Labreuche J, Habza O, Gascou G, Lefèvre PH, Eker O, Mourand I, Gaillard N, Charif M, Derraz I, Arquizan C, Costalat V. Angiographic patterns and outcomes achieved by proximal balloon occlusion in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis stenting. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30:363–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00770-8 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gabrielli R, Castrucci T, Siani A, Accrocca F, Rizzo AR, Spinelli A, Cancellieri R, Bartoli S. Common carotid artery endovascular clamping for neuroprotection during carotid stenting: flow-gate system as an innovative treatment approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:E71–E8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29287 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Salem MM, Kvint S, Baig AA, Monteiro A, Cortez GM, Kuhn AL, Goren O, Dalal S, Jankowitz BT, Choudhri O, Raper D, Tanweer O, Jabbour P, Kan P, Starke RM, Levy EI, Griessenauer CJ, Puri AS, Hanel R, Siddiqui AH, Burkhardt JK. Carotid artery revascularization using the Walrus balloon guide catheter: Safety and feasibility from a US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022;14:709–17. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018126 . - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous