Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0324207.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324207. eCollection 2025.

Sex differences in pre-surgical respiratory physiotherapy impact on hospital and ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients: An observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Sex differences in pre-surgical respiratory physiotherapy impact on hospital and ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients: An observational study

Jorge Montero-Cámara et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases may be amenable to surgical intervention. To mitigate post-surgical complications, diverse strategies are employed, including pre-habilitation programs. This study examines the effect of an unsupervised pre-surgical respiratory physiotherapy program on both sexes in terms of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay lengths, as well as the incidence of post-surgical complications, their severity, and mortality risk.

Methodology: Retrospective observational study of 418 adults who underwent open-heart surgery between 2018 and 2022. The subjects were divided into two sex-based groups based on attendance at individual pre-surgical physiotherapy sessions. A Mann-Whitney U test was employed to evaluate the impact of the pre-surgical respiratory physiotherapy program and a Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test to assess its influence on both sexes. Additionally, a multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of various variables on overall length of stay.

Results: The mean age of women was higher (p = 0.002), and they exhibited longer mean lengths of ICU (p = 0.004) and hospital stays (p = 0.031). In both sexes, a statistically significant reduction in LOS was observed among those undergoing a respiratory physiotherapy program. The linear regression analysis indicated that male sex was associated with a reduction in hospital and ICU stay lengths (p < 0.001). Although women experienced a higher number of complications (p = 0.043), no differences in severity levels or mortality risk were observed between sexes.

Conclusion: An unsupervised home pre-surgical physiotherapy program based on ventilatory exercises can reduce hospital and ICU stay for both men and women. Notwithstanding the higher incidence of complications in women, no differences in severity or mortality risk were observed between sexes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. ICULOS comparison between groups by sex and attendance or non-attendance in pre-surgical physiotherapy.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Female no pre-surg: females who did not attend individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; Female pre-surg: females who attended individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; ICULOS: Intensive care unit length of stay in hours; Male no pre-surg: Males who did not attend individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; Male pre-surg: Males who attended individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; p: statistical significance value.
Fig 2
Fig 2. HLOS comparison between groups by sex and attendance or non-attendance in pre-surgical physiotherapy.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Female no pre-surg: females who did not attend individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; Female pre-surg: females who attended individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; HLOS: Hospital length of stay in hours; Male no pre-surg: Males who did not attend individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; Male pre-surg: Males who attended individual pre-surgical physiotherapy session; p: statistical significance value.

Similar articles

References

    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al.. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, Torbica A, Katus H, De Smedt D, et al.. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(8):716–99. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab892 - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al.. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hornero Sos F, Centella Hernández T, Polo López L, López Menéndez J, Mestres Lucio C-A, Bustamante Munguira J, et al.. Recomendaciones de la SECTCV para la cirugía cardiovascular. 2019 actualización de los estándares en organización, actividad profesional, calidad asistencial y formación en la especialidad. Cirugía Cardiovascular. 2019;26(2):104–23. doi: 10.1016/j.circv.2018.10.001 - DOI

Publication types