Assessing frailty in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A comparison between the patient-reported frailty phenotype and the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index
- PMID: 40472573
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102266
Assessing frailty in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A comparison between the patient-reported frailty phenotype and the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index
Abstract
Introduction: The International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG FI) is one of the most used frailty assessment tools in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A patient-centered frailty tool based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been recently proposed for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM): the Patient-Reported Frailty Phenotype (PRFP). This cross-sectional analysis aimed to replicate the PRFP within a real-world setting and to describe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) profiles based on this new patient-centered frailty classification.
Materials and methods: This analysis was based on baseline data from a multi-center prospective observational study that included adult patients with RRMM. Frailty was assessed using the IMWG FI, and HRQoL was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its myeloma module (QLQ-MY20). For this analysis, the PRFP was also calculated, and Cohen's kappa was computed to examine the agreement between the two frailty assessment approaches. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate the HRQoL profiles of patients classified as frail, pre-frail, and fit.
Results: Five hundred eleven patients were enrolled. The median age was 69.8 years, and 44 % were female. According to IMWG FI and PRFP, 24.5 % and 25.1 % of patients were classified as frail, with a weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.27, indicating fair agreement. Frail patients, as classified by the PRFP, reported higher treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and worse future perspectives and body image compared to pre-frail and fit patients.
Discussion: Current findings suggest that the PRFP may be a valuable tool to assess frailty in patients with RRMM. However, further prospective studies are needed to better understand the value of PROs in a more accurate assessment of frailty in the RRMM setting.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03190525.
Keywords: Frailty; Patient-reported outcomes; Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Fabio Efficace had a consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Novartis and JAZZ Pharmaceuticals and Research support (institution) from Daiichi Sankyo, all outside the submitted work. Gianluca Gaidano: Advisory Board and/or Speaker's Bureau: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Hikma, Incyte, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, all outside the submitted work. Marco Vignetti reports honoraria from AbbVie, and Novartis; all outside the submitted work. All the other authors declared no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Patient-reported frailty phenotype (PRFP) vs. International Myeloma Working Group frailty index (IMWG FI) proxy: A comparison between two approaches to measuring frailty.J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Mar;15(2):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101681. Epub 2023 Dec 16. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38104480
-
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone: An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes From the Phase 3 CANDOR Trial.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025 Aug;25(8):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025. PMID: 40087058 Clinical Trial.
-
Cumulative deficits frailty index and relationship status predict survival in multiple myeloma.Blood Adv. 2025 Mar 11;9(5):1137-1146. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014624. Blood Adv. 2025. PMID: 39693516 Free PMC article.
-
Gait parameters and daily physical activity for distinguishing pre-frail, frail, and non-frail older adults: A scoping review.J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jul;29(7):100580. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100580. Epub 2025 May 14. J Nutr Health Aging. 2025. PMID: 40373391 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous