Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;29(8):102112.
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102112. Epub 2025 Jun 3.

Comparative outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of weight loss and micronutrient deficiencies in super-obese patients in 12 months

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of weight loss and micronutrient deficiencies in super-obese patients in 12 months

Zahraa Futooh et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and evaluating postoperative micronutrient disturbances in patients with super-obesity.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records of patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥50 kg/m² who underwent either OAGB or LSG.

Results: A total of 92 patients were included in the analysis (53 in the LSG group and 39 in the OAGB). The OAGB group was significantly older than the LSG group (median: 41 vs 33 years, respectively; P =.001). Baseline weight, height, BMI, electrolyte levels, and most biochemical markers were comparable between groups. The LSG group had a significantly shorter operative time than the OAGB group (median: 30 vs 53 min, respectively; P <.0001). Comorbidities were more prevalent in the OAGB group than in the LSG group, with higher rates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension (35.9% vs 3.8%, respectively; P <.0001) and ischemic heart disease (12.8% vs 0.0%, respectively; P =.012). Postoperative hospital stay and overall complication rates were similar (3.8% in the LSG group vs 7.8% in the OAGB group; P =.349). At 12 months, the OAGB group achieved significantly greater %excess body weight loss than the LSG group (86.6% vs 78.2%, respectively; P <.0001). Although early postoperative weight loss was comparable, the OAGB group had a lower median weight at 12 months than the LSG group (78.5 vs 89.0 kg, respectively; P =.003). Postoperative albumin, hemoglobin, ferritin, and zinc levels were significantly lower in the OAGB group than in the LSG group (P ≤.03).

Conclusion: OAGB achieved more significant long-term weight loss than LSG in patients with super-obesity. However, OAGB was associated with a higher risk of micronutrient deficiencies, particularly in iron, vitamin B12, and zinc, than LSG. LSG may be preferable for patients at higher risk of nutritional deficiencies.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Nutritional deficiencies; One-anastomosis gastric bypass; Super-obese.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

MeSH terms