Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Progress, challenges, and ethical implications
- PMID: 40473198
- DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101374
Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Progress, challenges, and ethical implications
Abstract
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in ophthalmology holds great promise for improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing workflows, and enhancing patient care. However, regulatory, ethical, and technical challenges must be addressed to ensure its safe and effective implementation. Bias in AI can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, while the "black-box problem" raises concerns about transparency and trust. Ethical principles must guide AI integration, particularly regarding patient safety, accountability, and liability. Privacy risks related to data collection and security are especially critical in ophthalmology, where large imaging datasets are essential. Additionally, AI-generated inaccuracies, or "hallucinations," pose potential risks to clinical decision-making. Cybersecurity threats targeting AI-powered healthcare systems further emphasize the need for robust protections. Despite these challenges, AI has the potential to improve access to ophthalmic care, particularly in underserved regions, as seen in AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening. However, financial and infrastructural barriers remain significant obstacles to widespread adoption. Addressing these issues requires collaboration among stakeholders, including regulators, healthcare providers, AI developers, and policymakers, to establish clear guidelines and promote trustworthy AI systems. This review explores key regulatory and ethical concerns and highlights strategies to ensure the responsible integration of AI into ophthalmology.
Keywords: AI ethical considerations; Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology; Black-box problem; Data privacy; Liability; Patient safety; Trustworthy AI.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02653-6. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39232725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Medical Professionals' Acceptance and Institutional Challenges in Implementation.J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70170. doi: 10.1111/jep.70170. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40581976
-
Navigating ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for patient care: A systematic review.Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e13059. doi: 10.1111/inr.13059. Epub 2024 Nov 15. Int Nurs Rev. 2025. PMID: 39545614
-
Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Primer on Techniques and Breakthroughs.Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jul;9(4):501-517. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00580-4. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Pharmacoecon Open. 2025. PMID: 40301283 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications, challenges, and future directions.Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2527505. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2527505. Epub 2025 Jul 4. Future Sci OA. 2025. PMID: 40616302 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources