Collapse of interictal suppressive networks permits seizure spread
- PMID: 40473247
- DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaf215
Collapse of interictal suppressive networks permits seizure spread
Abstract
How do brain networks limit seizure activity? In the interictal suppression hypothesis, we recently postulated that high inward connectivity to seizure onset zones (SOZs) from non-involved zones (NIZs) is a sign of broader network suppression. If broad networks appear to be responsible for interictal SOZ suppression, what changes during seizure initiation, spread and termination? For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, intracranial monitoring offers a view into the electrographic networks that organize around and in response to the SOZ. In this manuscript, we investigate network dynamics in the peri-ictal periods to assess possible mechanisms of seizure suppression and the consequences of this suppression being overwhelmed. Peri-ictal network dynamics were derived from stereo electroencephalography recordings from 75 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We computed directed connectivity from 5 s windows in the periods between, immediately before, during and after 668 seizures. We aligned connectivity matrices across seizures and patients, then calculated net connectivity changes from the SOZ, propagative zone and NIZ. Across all seizure types, we observed two phases: a rapid increase in directed communication towards the SOZ, followed by a collapse in network connectivity. During the first phase, SOZs could be distinguished from all other regions (one-way ANOVA, P = 8.32 × 10-19-2.22 × 10-7). In the second phase and post-ictal period, SOZ inward connectivity decreased yet remained distinct (one-way ANOVA, P = 2.58 × 10-10-1.66 × 10-2). NIZs appeared to drive increased SOZ connectivity while intra-NIZ connectivity decreased concordantly. Stratifying by seizure subtype, we found that consciousness-impairing seizures decrease inward connectivity from the NIZ earlier than consciousness-sparing seizures (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.01 after false discovery correction). Tracking network reorganization against a surrogate for seizure involvement highlighted a possible antagonism between seizure propagation and the ability of the NIZ to maintain high connectivity to the SOZ. Finally, we found that inclusion of peri-ictal connectivity improved the accuracy of SOZ classification from previous models to a combined area under the curve of 93%. Overall, NIZs appear actively to increase inhibitory signaling towards the SOZ during seizure onset, possibly to thwart seizure activity. Although inhibition appears insufficient to prevent seizure onset, the inability to restrict seizure propagation might contribute to loss of consciousness during larger seizures. Dynamic connectivity patterns uncovered in this work might: (i) facilitate accurate delineation of surgical targets in focal epilepsy; (ii) reveal why interictal suppression of SOZs might be insufficient to prevent all seizures; and (iii) provide insight into mechanisms of loss of consciousness during certain seizures.
Keywords: drug-resistant epilepsy; epilepsy surgery; interictal suppression hypothesis; network dynamics; networks; stereo electroencephalography.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Comment in
-
Better annotations, better outcomes: extending the suppression hypothesis to seizure times.Brain. 2025 Dec 4;148(12):4164-4165. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf436. Brain. 2025. PMID: 41239867 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
