Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jun 5:389:e085680.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2025-085680.

Sacituzumab tirumotecan versus docetaxel for previously treated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sacituzumab tirumotecan versus docetaxel for previously treated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial

Wenfeng Fang et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after previous treatment failure with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and platinum based chemotherapy.

Design: Multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 48 centres in China, 1 September 2023 to 31 December 2024.

Participants: 137 adults (aged 18-75 years) with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic NSCLC after previous treatment failure with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and platinum based chemotherapy.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive sac-TMT (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 of each four week cycle, or docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each three week cycle. Patients in the docetaxel group were permitted to crossover to sac-TMT treatment on disease progression.

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was objective response rate as assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate assessed by the investigator; disease control rate, progression-free survival, time to response, and duration of response assessed by BIRC and the investigator; overall survival; and safety.

Results: 137 patients were randomised to receive sac-TMT (n=91) or docetaxel (n=46). Median follow-up was 12.2 months at the data cut-off for efficacy (31 December 2024). BIRC assessed objective response rate was significantly higher in the sac-TMT group (45% (41/91)) v docetaxel (16% (7/45)), with a difference of 29% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 43%; one sided P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was longer with sac-TMT than with docetaxel assessed by BIRC (6.9 v 2.8 months; hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.46; one sided P<0.001) and the investigator (7.9 v 2.8 months; hazard ratio 0.23, 0.15 to 0.36; one sided P<0.001). The 12 month overall survival rate was 73% with sac-TMT and 54% with docetaxel (hazard ratio 0.49, 0.27 to 0.88; one sided P=0.007). After adjustment for crossover using the rank-preserving structural failure time model, sac-TMT also showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.36, 0.20 to 0.66). Grade ≥3 treatment related adverse events were less frequent with sac-TMT than with docetaxel (56% v 72%), with no new safety signals identified.

Conclusions: Sac-TMT showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with docetaxel, with a manageable safety profile in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05631262.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical, and partial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project for the submitted work; JY, YD, XJ, and JG are employed by Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical YD, XJ, and JG hold company stock; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Trial profile. *Four patients had radiology detected disease progression verified by blinded independent review committee (BIRC). sac-TMT=sacituzumab tirumotecan
Fig 2
Fig 2
Waterfall plots showing antitumour activity assessed by blinded independent review committee in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; sac-TMT=sacituzumab tirumotecan
Fig 3
Fig 3
Time to response and duration of response in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer according to treatment. PR=partial response; sac-TMT=sacituzumab tirumotecan
Fig 4
Fig 4
Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer receiving sac-TMT or docetaxel. (Panel A) Progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent review committee; (panel B) progression-free survival assessed by investigator; (panel C) overall survival; and (panel D) overall survival using RPSFT model to adjust for crossover effects. BIRC=blinded independent review committee; CI=confidence interval; EGFR=epidermal growth factor receptor; NE=not evaluable; NR=not reached; RPSFT=rank-preserving structural failure time; sac-TMT=sacituzumab tirumotecan

References

    1. Thai AA, Solomon BJ, Sequist LV, Gainor JF, Heist RS. Lung cancer. Lancet 2021;398:535-54. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00312-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melosky B, Kambartel K, Häntschel M, et al. Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Mol Diagn Ther 2022;26:7-18. 10.1007/s40291-021-00563-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riely GJ, Wood DE, Ettinger DS, et al. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024;22:249-74. 10.6004/jnccn.2204.0023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lai-Kwon J, Tiu C, Pal A, Khurana S, Minchom A. Moving beyond epidermal growth factor receptor resistance in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer - a drug development perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021;159:103225. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawaguchi T, Ando M, Asami K, et al. Randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA). J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1902-8. 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4694. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data