Values and preferences regarding the health sector response to interpersonal violence against transgender and gender-diverse individuals: a systematic review
- PMID: 40473455
- DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00091-4
Values and preferences regarding the health sector response to interpersonal violence against transgender and gender-diverse individuals: a systematic review
Abstract
Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people are disproportionately affected by interpersonal violence and face barriers to accessing post-violence health services globally. Post-violence care guidelines are broadly applicable, but specific considerations for TGD individuals have not been synthesised. In this systematic review, we synthesise the values and preferences of TGD adults and health providers related to post-violence health services. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, LILACS, and PsycINFO for qualitative and quantitative studies reporting on values and preferences related to health services received or sought by TGD adults following interpersonal violence published between Jan 1, 2013, and March 31, 2024. We qualitatively summarised findings by study design, location, and population, and we provided confidence ratings using GRADE CERQual. We included 16 studies reporting data from ten countries. Themes included health provider education, quality of care, inclusive advertising, TGD-inclusive policies and service environments, representation of TGD individuals within service roles, dedicated services, cross-sectoral health navigation and coordination, mental health care, and accessibility of post-violence health-care locations. Health provider training, gender-affirming policies and practices, and inclusive environments can increase access and enhance effectiveness of post-violence health services for TGD individuals. Tailored guidelines for post-violence care provision to TGD people are needed to ensure equitable access globally.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Reproductive health risks and clinician practices with gender diverse adolescents and young adults.Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1689-1697. doi: 10.1111/andr.13026. Epub 2021 May 24. Andrology. 2021. PMID: 33942552 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding community member and health care professional perspectives on gender-affirming care-A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0255568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255568. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34398877 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy in the Veterans Health Administration.Ann Behav Med. 2023 Nov 16;57(12):1014-1023. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad035. Ann Behav Med. 2023. PMID: 37436725
-
Caring for Transgender and Gender Diverse Prehospital Patients: A NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025;29(3):302-314. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2024.2411723. Epub 2024 Nov 5. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2025. PMID: 39422378
-
Gender-Affirming Care Is Not Standard Care in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.Am J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 1;79(2):7902180060. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2025.050883. Am J Occup Ther. 2025. PMID: 39976641
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources