Association between plasma proteomic dynamic changes and metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
- PMID: 40473959
- DOI: 10.1038/s41366-025-01812-7
Association between plasma proteomic dynamic changes and metabolic outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
Abstract
Background: Bariatric surgery (BS) improves long-term glycemic control more effectively than medical treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The objective of this study was to explore the dynamic changes on inflammatory and metabolic-related circulating proteins in a large cohort of overweight patients and patients with class I to III obesity undergoing bariatric surgery (BS).
Subjects/methods: We performed quantitative proteomic analysis (399 inflammatory/metabolic proteins, Olink Proteomics) in plasma samples collected before (n = 114) and 1 month (n = 67), 3 months (n = 64), 6 months (n = 60), 12 months (n = 48) and 24 months (n = 18) after either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).
Results: Circulating proteins primarily expressed in the liver markedly changed after BS including IGFBP-1/2 (upregulated at all time points post-surgery) and the peroxisomal enzyme HAOX1 (downregulated at all time points post-surgery). Regression analysis revealed a strong association between the changes in HAOX1 and improvements in liver enzymes. In addition, a soluble broad-spectrum pattern recognition receptor, scavenger receptor cysteine rich family member with 4 domains (SSC4D), exhibited the highest decrease among all proteins at 24 months post-surgery. Finally, we detected that inflammatory markers were transiently increased after RYGB compared to VSG as well as in patients with severe obesity compared to patients with overweight and patients with obesity at 1-month post-surgery.
Conclusions: This study identified novel inflammatory and metabolic proteins possibly implicated in the systemic metabolic response to BS.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Rates, Risks, and Time to Fracture in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Ann Surg Open. 2021 Oct 12;2(4):e099. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000099. eCollection 2021 Dec. Ann Surg Open. 2021. PMID: 37637884 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term improvements in cognitive function following vertical sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en Y gastric bypass: a direct comparison study.Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2248-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07015-2. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31367985 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Serum Glucagon, Bile Acids, and FGF-19: Metabolic Behavior Patterns After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obes Surg. 2021 Nov;31(11):4939-4946. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05677-3. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 34471996
-
Changes in Bile Acid Metabolism, Transport, and Signaling as Central Drivers for Metabolic Improvements After Bariatric Surgery.Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Jun;8(2):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00334-4. Curr Obes Rep. 2019. PMID: 30847736 Review.
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pol Przegl Chir. 2024 Jan 15;96(3):69-82. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674. Pol Przegl Chir. 2024. PMID: 38940248
References
-
- Simonson DC, Halperin F, Foster K, Vernon A, Goldfine AB. Clinical and Patient-centered outcomes in obese patients with type 2 diabetes 3 years after randomization to roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery versus intensive lifestyle management: the SLIMM-T2D study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:670–9. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
-
- Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:964–73. - PubMed - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials