Comparison of different scoring systems for prediction of postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 40474024
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02406-1
Comparison of different scoring systems for prediction of postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract
To evaluate the predictive value of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score, Comorbidity Score for Robotic Surgery (CRS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in relation to postoperative complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A total of 374 patients who underwent RARP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 50) or absence (n = 324) of postoperative complications, as classified by the Modified Clavien-Dindo system. Demographics, comorbidities, ASA and ECOG scores, perioperative data, E-PASS score, CRS, and CCI scores were compared between groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for complications, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the discriminative ability of each scoring system. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 60% of complications were Grade 2, followed by Grade 1 (26%) and Grade 3 (8%). Patients with complications had significantly higher rates of hypertension (p = 0.018), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.015), ECOG score (p < 0.001), ASA score (p = 0.02), longer operation time (p = 0.02), higher E-PASS score (p < 0.001) and CRS score (p = 0.007). The CCI did not show a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.54). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the E-PASS score was the independent risk factor for postoperative complications (Odds Ratio: 18.633, 95% CI: 3.644-94.749, p < 0.001). The E-PASS score appears to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications following RARP, whereas the CRS and CCI failed to show significant prognostic value in this cohort. Integrating E-PASS parameters into preoperative evaluation may enhance postoperative risk stratification and inform patient counseling strategies.
Keywords: CCI score; CRS score; Complications; E-PASS; Robotic prostatectomy.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (Approval #: 1-25-944). Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all the patiens before the surgery.
Similar articles
-
The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0. BMC Urol. 2025. PMID: 40783515 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28895658 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) predicts postoperative complications after adrenalectomy.Updates Surg. 2025 Jun;77(3):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02145-w. Epub 2025 Mar 3. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40032802 Free PMC article.
-
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 34429272
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maynou L, Mehtsun WT, Serra-Sastre V, Papanicolas I (2021) Patterns of adoption of robotic radical prostatectomy in the United States and England. Health Serv Res. 56(Suppl 3):1441–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13706 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Haga Y, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1999) Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) as a new prediction scoring system for postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 29(3):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02483010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cannoletta D, Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P, Pettenuzzo G, Pacini M, Lambertini L et al (2024) Development and validation of a novel comorbidity score specific for prostate cancer patients treated with robotic platform and its implication on DaVinci single-port system. J Robot Surg. 18(1):400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02152-w - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical