Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;17(8):585-594.
doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2513853. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

Oncolytic immunovirotherapy: finding the tumor antigen needle in the antiviral haystack

Affiliations
Review

Oncolytic immunovirotherapy: finding the tumor antigen needle in the antiviral haystack

Benjamin L Kendall et al. Immunotherapy. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Immunovirotherapy integrates the oncolytic capabilities of viruses with the modulation of the host immune system to establish robust tumor-specific immune responses. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are natural or engineered viruses that specifically replicate in and lyse tumor cells, triggering inflammation which recruits immune effector cells to the site of infection. These conditions theoretically synergize with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which aids in establishing and maintaining tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells. However, clinical data directly confirming synergy between OV and ICB therapy is limited despite ICB becoming the standard of care for several cancer types. It has been shown that viral immunodominance may limit antitumor T-cell priming and cause the attrition of tumor-specific T cells, limiting long-term therapeutic efficacy. To overcome these barriers, precise incorporation of virally expressed or exogenously administered tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can synchronize the expansion of both antiviral and antitumor T cells, creating optimal conditions for ICB treatment. This tripartite approach leverages our understanding of antiviral immunity to efficiently expand subdominant antitumor T cells in vivo. In this review, we dissect the fundamental paradigm of immunovirotherapy regarding antiviral inflammation and TAAs, followed by relevant combinatorial strategies employed in preclinical and clinical settings for the treatment of solid tumors.

Keywords: CD8 T cells; antitumor immunity; antiviral immunity; immune checkpoint blockade; immunotherapy; oncolytic virotherapy.

Plain language summary

Immunovirotherapy is a new cancer treatment strategy that uses specially designed viruses to attack cancer cells and help the body’s immune system fight tumors. These viruses, called oncolytic viruses, are made to infect and destroy only cancer cells. When they do this, they also cause inflammation, which attracts the body’s immune cells to the tumor. This process can work well with another type of treatment called immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which helps immune cells stay active against cancer. However, studies have not yet clearly shown that combining these two treatments is always better than using ICB alone. One challenge is that the immune system may focus too much on fighting the virus, rather than the cancer itself. To solve this, researchers are adding cancer markers, called tumor-associated antigens, to the viruses or giving them separately. This helps the immune system target both the virus and the cancer more effectively. This review explains how these combined approaches work and looks at the latest research on using them together to treat solid tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Similar articles

References

    1. Matveeva OV, Chumakov PM.. Defects in interferon pathways as potential biomarkers of sensitivity to oncolytic viruses. Rev Med Virol. 2018;28(6):e2008. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cai J, Lin K, Cai W, et al. Tumors driven by RAS signaling harbor a natural vulnerability to oncolytic virus M1. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(12):3153–3168. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12820 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marchini A, Ilkow C, Melcher A. Oncolytic virus immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(15):3672. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153672 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feola S, Russo S, Ylösmäki E, et al. Oncolytic ImmunoViroTherapy: a long history of crosstalk between viruses and immune system for cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;236:108103–. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melcher A, Harrington K, Vile R. Oncolytic virotherapy as immunotherapy. Science (AAAS). 2021;374(6573):1325–1326. doi: 10.1126/science.abk3436 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources