Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 3;2(4):e12052.
doi: 10.1002/cesm.12052. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Consideration of health inequity in systematic reviews and primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss

Affiliations

Consideration of health inequity in systematic reviews and primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss

Simon Briscoe et al. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. .

Abstract

Background: Health inequities are systematic, avoidable, and unfair differences in health between populations or population subgroups. There is increased recognition of the need for systematic reviews (SRs) to address health inequities, including drawing out findings relevant to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which SRs on risk factors for hearing loss reported findings associated with health inequities, and the extent to which this data was captured in the primary studies included within these SRs.

Methods: We identified SRs on risk factors for hearing loss from a report on this topic which included a systematic search for relevant SRs. SRs thus identified were inspected for data related to health inequity with reference to PROGRESS-Plus. We compared how data were reported in SRs versus within primary studies included in the SRs, and the extent to which primary studies from LMICs were represented.

Results: We included 17 SRs which reported findings on a variety of physiological, behavioral, demographic, and environmental risk factors for hearing loss. There were 296 unique primary studies included in the SRs, of which 251 (81.49%) were successfully retrieved. Data relating to health inequities was reported relatively infrequently in the SRs and mainly focused on gender and age. Data related to health inequities was more frequently reported in primary studies. However, several PROGRESS-Plus criteria were only reported in a minority of primary studies. Approximately one-third of primary studies were from LMICs.

Conclusions: There is scope to improve the reporting of data relating to health inequities in primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss. However, SR authors could do more to report health inequities than is currently undertaken, including drawing out findings relevant to LMICs where data are available.

Keywords: health equity; health inequalities; hearing loss; observational studies; systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary studies included in systematic reviews per year of publication.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of systematic reviews reporting PROGRESS‐Plus criteria at baseline and in results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of observational studies reporting PROGRESS‐Plus criteria at baseline and in results.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organisation . About WHO's Work on Health Inequality Monitoring; 2023. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.who.int/data/inequality-monitor/about
    1. Williams E, Buck D, Babaloa G, Maguire D. What are Health Inequalities; 2022. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/what-are-health-inequalities
    1. McCartney G, Popham F, McMaster R, Cumbers A. Defining health and health inequalities. Public Health. 2019;172:22‐30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities . Health Disparities and Health Inequalities: Applying All Our Health; 2022. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-disparities-and-health...
    1. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews: table 1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(2):190‐193. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources