Machine learning for accelerating screening in evidence reviews
- PMID: 40475071
- PMCID: PMC11795896
- DOI: 10.1002/cesm.12021
Machine learning for accelerating screening in evidence reviews
Abstract
Evidence reviews are important for informing decision-making and primary research, but they can be time-consuming and costly. With the advent of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, there is an opportunity to accelerate the review process at many stages, with study screening identified as a prime candidate for assistance. Despite the availability of a large number of tools promising to assist with study screening, these are not consistently used in practice and there is skepticism about their application. Single-arm evaluations suggest the potential for tools to reduce screening burden. However, their integration into practice may need further investigation through evaluations of outcomes such as overall resource use and impact on review findings and recommendations. Because the literature lacks comparative studies, it is not currently possible to determine their relative accuracy. In this commentary, we outline the published research and discuss options for incorporating tools into the review workflow, considering the needs and requirements of different types of review.
Keywords: machine learning; rapid review; record screening; systematic review.
© 2023 The Authors. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Sep;181:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023. PMID: 37596160 Review.
-
An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01129-1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020. PMID: 33059590 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yan K, Balijepalli C, Druyts E. Is it always possible to complete a systematic review in 2 weeks? Further thoughts and considerations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;126:162‐163. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources