Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 15;2(5):e12057.
doi: 10.1002/cesm.12057. eCollection 2024 May.

Development of a topic-specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010

Lasse Østengaard  1   2   3 , Ariel Barrientos  4 , Isabelle Boutron  5   6 , An-Wen Chan  7 , Gary Collins  8 , Sally Hopewell  9 , David Moher  10   11 , Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard  1   2 , Kenneth F Schulz  12 , Benjamin Speich  9   13 , Evan Tang  14 , Ruth Tunn  9 , Nozomi Watanabe  15 , Chenchen Xu  10   16 , Asbjørn Hróbjartsson  1   2
Affiliations

Development of a topic-specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010

Lasse Østengaard et al. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. .

Abstract

Introduction: An important mechanism of research waste is inadequate incorporation of, and references to, previous relevant research. Identifying references for a research manuscript can be challenging, in part due to the exponential rise in potentially relevant literature to consider. For large research projects, such as developing or updating reporting guidelines, it may be helpful to construct a supportive topic-specific bibliographic database.

Methods: In support of updating the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 and the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010, we developed the SPIRIT-CONSORT Evidence Bibliographic database (SCEBdb): a freely available topic-specific bibliographic database of publications providing an evidence foundation for the updates. We searched multiple sources of potential publications and tagged included ones with database-specific keywords. For context, we also formulated 10 core considerations for constructing topic-specific bibliographic databases and identified and described 5 illustrative other databases.

Results: As of April 2024, the SCEBdb included 846 publications. The database proved useful as a supplementary information source for our scoping review of published comments on SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010, for a supplementary Delphi process, and in the writing phase of the guidance documents. We expect that the database will be useful for future projects within the fields of clinical research methodology, bias, evidence synthesis, and randomized trials.

Conclusion: The methods involved in constructing the SCEBdb, and our suggested core considerations for topic-specific bibliographic databases, could be helpful for researchers reflecting on whether, and how, to develop a topic-specific bibliographic database.

Keywords: CONSORT (CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials); SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials); bibliographic database; reporting guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B. S. received unrestricted grants from Moderna (2021/22) for studies unrelated to the presented work. I. B., A.‐W. C., G. C., S. H., D. M., K. F. S., R. T., and A. H. are part of the joint executive group for the planned updates of SPIRIT and CONSORT. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram. [13]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):224. 10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w - DOI
    1. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156‐165. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sawin VI, Robinson KA. Biased and inadequate citation of prior research in reports of cardiovascular trials is a continuing source of waste in research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:174‐178. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lund H, Brunnhuber K, Juhl C, et al. Towards evidence based research. BMJ. 2016;355:i5440. 10.1136/bmj.i5440 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hrobjartsson A. Rapid response: wrong information on previous studies of the clinical use of placebo. BMJ. 2004;329:944. https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/wrong-information-previous...

LinkOut - more resources