Utility of genome sequencing and group-enrichment to support splice variant interpretation in Marfan syndrome
- PMID: 40476350
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2025.101477
Utility of genome sequencing and group-enrichment to support splice variant interpretation in Marfan syndrome
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the impact of noncanonical FBN1 splice site variants in undiagnosed Marfan syndrome (MFS), a connective tissue disorder associated with skeletal abnormalities and familial thoracic aortic aneurysm disease (FTAAD).
Methods: A systematic analysis of ultrarare FBN1 variants was performed using genome sequencing data from the 100,000 Genomes Project. Variants were annotated with SpliceAI and the significance of enrichment among individuals with FTAAD was assessed using Fisher's exact test. Experimental validation used RNA sequencing, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, minigene constructs, and replication analysis was with data from UK Biobank.
Results: Using aggregate data for 78,195 individuals, we identified 13,864 singleton single-nucleotide variants in FBN1 of which 21 were predicted to affect splicing (SpliceAI > 0.5). Incidence of candidate splice variants in individuals recruited with FTAAD (9/703) was significantly elevated compared with that seen in non-FTAAD participants (12/77,492; odds ratio = 84, P = 9.7 × 10-14). Additional analysis uncovered a further 14 families harboring 11 different FBN1 splice variants. A total of 20 candidate splice variants in 23 families were identified, of which 70% lay beyond the ±8 splice regions. RNA testing confirmed the predicted splice aberration in 16 of 20 and for 9 of 20, pseudoexonization was the likely splicing anomaly.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that noncanonical splice variants may account for approximately 3% of families with undiagnosed FTAAD, highlighting the importance of incorporating analysis of introns and confirmatory RNA testing into genetic testing for Marfan syndrome.
Keywords: Aortic aneurysm; FBN1; Marfan syndrome; Pseudoexon; Splicing.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.