Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun;117(6):e2490.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2490.

Comparison of Perceived Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination Between Pregnant and NonPregnant Women Using Two Cohort Studies in the Netherlands

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Perceived Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination Between Pregnant and NonPregnant Women Using Two Cohort Studies in the Netherlands

Petra J Woestenberg et al. Birth Defects Res. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Maternal vaccines are upcoming. A clear picture of the adverse events (AEs) after maternal vaccination and whether this is comparable to a nonpregnant population is important. The objective of our study was to compare perceived AEs after COVID-19 vaccination between pregnant and nonpregnant women and to study if it is feasible to compare AEs within two independent Dutch cohort studies.

Methods: Data from the Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register (DPDR) and the cohort event monitoring (CEM) study on COVID-19 vaccines were used. At least one self-reported (solicited) AE, more than one AE, and specific self-reported AEs after the first doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were compared between pregnant and nonpregnant women using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: The pattern of AEs was similar between pregnant (n = 2204) and nonpregnant (n = 2684) women, with the four most frequently reported AEs being: injection site reaction, myalgia, fatigue, and headache. Pregnant women reported less often at least one AE compared to nonpregnant women (65.9% vs. 72.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.90), more than one AE, or specific AEs: nausea, chills, pyrexia, and arthralgia. Myalgia was more often reported among pregnant women compared to nonpregnant women.

Conclusions: Pregnant women perceived comparable or less often AEs after the first mRNA COVID-19 vaccination compared to nonpregnant women. The results aid pregnant women in making an informed decision about vaccination. A comparison between the pregnancy registry and the CEM study was feasible and this method can be used to compare AEs for other/future maternal vaccines.

Keywords: COVID‐19 vaccine; SARS‐CoV‐2; adverse events; cohort event monitoring; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the study population selection for the Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register (DPDR) and the cohort event monitoring (CEM) study on COVID‐19 vaccines separately. AEs, Adverse events. † Less than 2 weeks apart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Prevalence of perceived adverse events (AEs) by pregnancy status. AEs, Adverse events; CEM, Cohort event monitoring study on COVID‐19 vaccines; DPDR, Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Prevalence of perceived adverse events (AEs) by pregnancy status and study cohort. AEs, Adverse events; CEM, Cohort event monitoring (CEM) study on COVID‐19 vaccines; DPDR, Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register.* Chi‐square p‐value < 0.05.

References

    1. Barros, F. C. , Gunier R. B., Rego A., et al. 2024. “Maternal Vaccination Against COVID‐19 and Neonatal Outcomes During Omicron: INTERCOVID‐2022 Study.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 231: 460.e1–460.e17. 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bookstein Peretz, S. , Regev N., Novick L., et al. 2021. “Short‐Term Outcome of Pregnant Women Vaccinated With BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 Vaccine.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 58: 450–456. 10.1002/uog.23729. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brinkley, E. , Mack C. D., Albert L., et al. 2022. “COVID‐19 Vaccinations in Pregnancy: Comparative Evaluation of Acute Side Effects and Self‐Reported Impact on Quality of Life Between Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women in the United States.” American Journal of Perinatology 39: 1750–1753. 10.1055/s-0042-1748158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavoretto, P. I. , and Farina A.. 2024. “Time to Enhance COVID‐19 Vaccination in Women of Reproductive Age.” Lancet Regional Health‐Europe 45: 101069. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101069. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen, M. , Zeng J., Liu X., et al. 2020. “Changes in Physiology and Immune System During Pregnancy and Coronavirus Infection: A Review.” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 255: 124–128. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources