Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 6:17474930251349727.
doi: 10.1177/17474930251349727. Online ahead of print.

Ayurvedic treatment in the rehabilitation of ischemic stroke patients in India: A randomized controlled trial (RESTORE)

P N Sylaja  1 , Vivek Nambiar  2 , Sunil Narayan  3 , Jaya Pr  4 , C Suresh Kumar  5 , Pravith Nk  6 , Maanasi Madhavan Menon  7 , Vaidya Berengere Berieau  8 , Dhanya Nair  9 , Aneesh Dhasan  1 , Deepti Arora  10 , Shweta J Verma  10 , Meenakshi Sharma  11 , Rupinder S Dhaliwal  11 , P Sankara Sarma  12 , Jeyaraj Durai Pandian  10 ; RESTORE trial collaborators
Collaborators, Affiliations

Ayurvedic treatment in the rehabilitation of ischemic stroke patients in India: A randomized controlled trial (RESTORE)

P N Sylaja et al. Int J Stroke. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of Ayurvedic Rehabilitation therapy (ART) in improving the sensorimotor recovery of patients with ischemic stroke is unclear irrespective of the fact that ayurveda is a commonly practiced alternate system of medicine in India and south Asia. The trial hypothesized that ayurvedic treatment is superior to physiotherapy (PT) in recovery of ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: We performed investigator-initiated, multi-center prospective, parallel arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) with blinded outcome assessment across four comprehensive stroke centers in India. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ART arm (intervention group) or on to the PT arm (control group). The primary outcome was sensory motor recovery of upper extremity assessed using Fugl Meyer Assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE) and secondary outcome, a composite of functional disability, activities of daily living, postural balance and quality of life at 1- and 3-month follow-up. The safety outcomes were serious adverse events during the study duration.

Results: Of 403 participants screened, 140 patients were enrolled, 70 in intervention (ART) and 70 in control (PT) group. At 3 months, compared with ayurveda group, the sensory motor impairment (FMA-UE) score was significantly better in the PT group (71.97 ± 23.88 vs. 81.97 ± 24.57, p = 0.023) but after adjusting for age, stroke severity, baseline FMA-UE scale and risk factors, the group differences were not significant (p = 0.057). None of the secondary outcomes were significantly better in the ayurveda group. During the trial, no major serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: This pragmatic first-ever RCT of ayurveda in stroke looked into the benefit of ayurveda treatment in first ever stroke survivors. The current intervention protocol of ART was not superior to PT in improving the sensorimotor recovery of patients with ischemic stroke. This is the first RCT of its kind.

Keywords: Ayurveda treatment; ischemic stroke; physiotherapy; rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources