Indirect treatment comparisons of momelotinib vs pacritinib safety and anemia outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis
- PMID: 40476686
- PMCID: PMC12218468
- DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2511562
Indirect treatment comparisons of momelotinib vs pacritinib safety and anemia outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis
Abstract
Aim: To perform an indirect treatment comparison of safety and anemia outcomes between the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors momelotinib and pacritinib in patients with myelofibrosis.
Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and anemia outcomes were compared in a pooled population of JAK inhibitor - experienced and - naive patients treated with momelotinib (SIMPLIFY-1/SIMPLIFY-2/MOMENTUM) or pacritinib (PERSIST-2/PAC203).
Results: Momelotinib had statistically significantly lower odds and risk for all grades of diarrhea, nausea, peripheral edema, and vomiting as well as grade 3/4 and serious AEs vs pacritinib. Momelotinib-treated patients also had greater odds/possibility of hemoglobin improvement of ≥ 1 g/dL and clinical improvement in hemoglobin.
Conclusions: Momelotinib provides a more favorable safety profile and a higher chance for hemoglobin improvement vs pacritinib.
Keywords: JAK inhibitor; Myelofibrosis; indirect treatment comparison; momelotinib; pacritinib; safety.
Plain language summary
What is this article about?Myelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer that causes abnormal blood cell production. A class of medications known as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors can help treat symptoms, which include feeling tired and weak from too few red blood cells, as well as enlarged spleen. So far, four JAK inhibitors have been approved by the US FDA for treating myelofibrosis: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib. However, these JAK inhibitors have different side effects, and clinical trials that directly compare these medications are not always available. We used a method known as indirect comparison to further understand differences in the side effects between momelotinib and pacritinib.What were the results?The findings show that momelotinib was associated with a lower risk of some side effects, including anemia, diarrhea, nausea, swelling from fluid buildup, and vomiting. The study also showed that momelotinib is more likely to increase the amount of hemoglobin, which is a measure of anemia improvement, compared with pacritinib.What do the results of the study mean?These results suggest that momelotinib may be a treatment option with fewer unwanted side effects for people with myelofibrosis.
Conflict of interest statement
Lucia Masarova reports advisory board participation with MorphoSys. Srdan Verstovsek reports consultancy fees from GSK. Francesca Palandri reports consultancy fees from AOP, Celgene, and Novartis and honoraria from AOP, Celgene, CTI, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. Ruben Mesa reports honoraria/consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Blueprint, CTI, Genentech, Geron, GSK, Incyte, MorphoSys, Novartis, Sierra Oncology, Sierra, and Telios. Claire Harrison reports consultancy fees from DISC, Galecto, and Keros; honoraria from BMS, CTI, GSK, Novartis, and Sierra; advisory/safety board participation for AOP, Keros, Sumitomo, and Telios; and leadership/fiduciary roles for EHA, MPN Voice, and
Medical writing support for this manuscript was provided by Keng Jin Lee, PhD (Nucleus Global, an Inizio Company), based on the authors’ input and in accordance with ICMJE and GPP3 guidelines, and was supported by GSK.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Indirect treatment comparison of momelotinib vs fedratinib safety in patients with myelofibrosis.Future Oncol. 2025 Jul;21(16):2077-2087. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2511564. Epub 2025 Jun 6. Future Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40476514 Free PMC article.
-
Pacritinib vs Best Available Therapy, Including Ruxolitinib, in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):652-659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5818. JAMA Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29522138 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Longitudinal Assessment of Transfusion Intensity in Patients With JAK Inhibitor-Naive or -Experienced Myelofibrosis Treated With Momelotinib.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025 Mar;25(3):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 16. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025. PMID: 39516087 Clinical Trial.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3. PMID: 29271481 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Bristol Myers Squibb . Inrebic [Prescribing information]. 2022. Available from: https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_inrebic.pdf
-
- CTI Biopharma Corp . Vonjo (pacritinib). Prescribing information. 2022.
-
- Incyte Corporation . Jakafi (ruxolitinib). Prescribing information. 2021. Available from: https://www.jakafi.com/pdf/prescribing-information.pdf
-
- Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018. May 1;4(5):652–659. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
• This phase 3 study found that pacritinib was more effective than BAT for reducing splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia, including patients who were JAK inhibitor experienced.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical