Efficacy of Decontamination Methods for Biofilm Removal from Dental Implant Surfaces and Reosseointegration: An AAP/AO Systematic Review on Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions
- PMID: 40476898
Efficacy of Decontamination Methods for Biofilm Removal from Dental Implant Surfaces and Reosseointegration: An AAP/AO Systematic Review on Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the nonclinical evidence concerning the efficacy of different decontamination methods in facilitating reosseointegration, eliminating biofilm from implant surfaces, and their potential to induce adverse surface modifications and release of material remnants.
Materials and methods: Systematic electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify publications involving animal or human block biopsies, ex vivo/in situ studies, and in vitro studies. Mechanical, chemical, and electrolytic methods for implant decontamination were presented in a descriptive analysis.
Results: A total of 121 studies were included, namely 46 involving animal/human biopsies, 39 ex vivo/in situ experiments, and 36 in vitro investigations. No modality demonstrated significant superiority in terms of reosseointegration outcomes. Ex vivo, in situ, and in vitro studies reported that greater biofilm removal from implant surfaces occurred with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) ultrasonic tips, air-powder abrasive (APA), erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and electrolytic cleaning. Minimal surface alterations were noted with soaked cotton pellets, APA, specific settings of Er:YAG laser, erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser, electrolytic treatment, and cold atmospheric plasma. Titanium or stainless steel curettes, ultrasonic tips, titanium brushes, and implantoplasty induced significant surface alterations and peak flattening of implant threads. Plastic and carbon curettes as well as PEEK ultrasonic tips and APA left material remnants.
Conclusions: Implant reosseointegration is possible following appropriate surface decontamination. Application of Er:YAG laser, electrolytic cleaning, and APA stand out as the methods that most closely embody the ideal characteristics of an effective decontamination protocol.
Keywords: dental implants; disinfection; efficiency; lasers; osseointegration; peri-implantitis.
Similar articles
-
The effects of using erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the surface modification, bacterial decontamination, and cell adhesion on zirconia discs: an in vitro study.Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1701-1708. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03313-1. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Lasers Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33929623
-
Mechanical, chemical and laser treatments of the implant surface in the presence of marginal bone loss around implants.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5 Suppl:S71-81. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012. PMID: 22834396 Review.
-
Efficacy of an Er:YAG laser in the decontamination of dental implant surfaces: An in vitro study.J Periodontol. 2021 Nov;92(11):1613-1621. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0765. Epub 2021 Apr 6. J Periodontol. 2021. PMID: 33687796
-
Efficacy of a novel three-step decontamination protocol for titanium-based dental implants: An in vitro and in vivo study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Mar;35(3):268-281. doi: 10.1111/clr.14224. Epub 2023 Dec 22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024. PMID: 38131526
-
Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1043-54. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012. PMID: 23057016 Review.
Cited by
-
AO/AAP consensus on prevention and management of peri-implant diseases and conditions: Summary report.J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):519-541. doi: 10.1002/JPER.25-0270. Epub 2025 Jun 12. J Periodontol. 2025. PMID: 40501397 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous