Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1:51:104255.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104255. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Airborne infection risk assessment of COVID-19 in an inpatient department through on-site occupant behavior surveys

Affiliations

Airborne infection risk assessment of COVID-19 in an inpatient department through on-site occupant behavior surveys

Jiaxiong Li et al. J Build Eng. .

Abstract

Airborne transmission is a possible infection route of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This investigation focuses on the airborne infection risk of COVID-19 in a nursing unit in an inpatient building in Shenzhen, China. On-site measurements and questionnaire surveys were conducted to obtain the air change rates and occupant trajectories, respectively. The aerosol transport and dose-response models were applied to evaluate the infection risk. The average outdoor air change rate measured in the wards was 1.1 h-1, which is below the minimum limit of 2.0 h-1 required by ASHRAE 170-2021. Considering the surveyed occupant behavior during one week, the patients and their attendants spent an average of 19.4 h/d and 15.1 h/d, respectively, in the wards, whereas the nurses primarily worked in the nurse station (3.0 h/d) and wards (2.4 h/d). The doctors primarily worked in their offices (2.6 h/d) and wards (1.1 h/d). Assuming one undetected COVID-19 infector emitting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the nursing unit, we calculated the accumulated viral dose and infection probabilities of the occupants. After one week, the cumulative infection risks of the patients and attendants were almost equal (0.002), and were higher than those of the nurses (0.0013) and doctors (0.0004). Proper protection measures, such as reducing the number of attendants, increasing the air change rate, and wearing masks, were found to reduce the infection risk. It should be noted that the reported results are based on several assumptions, such as the speculated virological properties of SARS-CoV-2 and the particular trajectories of occupants. Moreover, only second generations of transmission were taken into consideration, whereas in reality, the week-long exposure may cause third generation of transmission or worse.

Keywords: COVID-19; Infection risk; Inpatient department; Occupant behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Nursing unit in a comprehensive hospital in Shenzhen, China: (a) surveyed inpatient building highlighted in orange and (b) plan of the inpatient building. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Virus transport via exhaled aerosols in a ward.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Removal rate for different particle size bins: (a) surface deposition rate; (b) filtration rate; and (c) total removal rate.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Flowchart of the study methodology.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Occupancy in different functional spaces: (a) doctors; (b) nurses; (c) patients; and (d) attendants.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Daily dwell times in different functional spaces: (a) daily-average dwell time; (b) dwell time quartile figure of medical staff; and (c) dwell time quartile figure of the patients and attendants.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Daily averaged contact duration: (a) cumulative histogram and (b) quartile figure.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Weekly infection probability: (a) total viral dose in different functional spaces and (b) infection probability of susceptible occupants from different groups.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Cross-infection probability among all occupant groups in the nursing unit.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Weekly infection risk in seven scenarios: (a) quartile graph of infection probability and (b) average infection probabilities of different occupant groups.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Distribution of infection risks for different values of k.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lipsitt J., Chan-Golston A.M., Liu J., Su J., Zhu Y., Jerrett M. Spatial analysis of COVID-19 and traffic-related air pollution in Los Angeles. Environ. Int. 2021;153:106531. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amankwah-Amoah J. COVID‐19 pandemic and innovation activities in the global airline industry: a review. Environ. Int. 2021;156:106719. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akbari P., Yazdanfar S., Hosseini S., Norouzian-Maleki S. Housing and mental health during outbreak of COVID-19. J. Build. Eng. 2021;43:102919. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102919. - DOI
    1. Morawska L., Milton D.K. It is time to address airborne transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharya A., Ghahramani A., Mousavi E. The effect of door opening on air-mixing in a positively pressurized room: implications for operating room air management during the COVID outbreak. J. Build. Eng. 2021;44 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102900. 102900. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources