Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;2(1):7.
doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00022-w. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

The influence of members' attachment style on group cohesion in substance use therapy groups

Affiliations

The influence of members' attachment style on group cohesion in substance use therapy groups

Anissa Naeli et al. Discov Psychol. 2022.

Abstract

Group cohesion is an important factor in group therapy as it influences treatment outcomes and group processes. One's attachment style has been found to impact experiences of group cohesion, however research into this relationship in substance use disorder (SUD) group treatment is lacking. This is of particular concern as insecure attachment presentations are more prevalent in this clinical population and group therapy is often treatment of choice. The current study sought to determine whether attachment style significantly predicted group cohesion. It also provided a qualitative exploration of factors that promote group cohesion in SUD group treatment. Participants (N = 38) attending a SUD therapy program completed self-report measures. Attachment avoidance was a significant negative predictor of positive bonding and positive working, and a significant positive predictor of negative relationships. Attachment anxiety was a significant negative predictor of negative relationships, however, unexpectedly did not significantly predict positive bonding or positive working. The current findings highlight the importance of group therapists tailoring group treatment to meet the attachment needs of individuals to promote a group therapy environment conducive to recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019. Canberra: AIHW; 2020 July 16. AIHW cat. no. PHE 270. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/illicit-use-of-drugs/national-drug-strat...
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Airlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Lo Coco G, Melchiori F, Oieni V, Infurna MR, Strauss B, Schwartze D, Rosendahl J, Gullo S. Group treatment for substance use disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019. 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.016. - PubMed
    1. Magill M, Ray LA. Cognitive-behavioral treatment with adult alcohol and illicit drug users: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009. 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olmstead TA, Graff FS, Ames-Sikora A, McCrady BS, Gaba A, Epstein EE. Cost-effectiveness of individual versus group female-specific cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019. 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.02.001. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources