The Value of Liquid and Solid Mixed Meal Tolerance Tests in Diagnosis of Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycaemic Syndrome After Gastric Bypass Surgery
- PMID: 40478434
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-025-07929-y
The Value of Liquid and Solid Mixed Meal Tolerance Tests in Diagnosis of Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycaemic Syndrome After Gastric Bypass Surgery
Abstract
Background: Precise diagnostics for postprandial reactive hypoglycaemic syndrome (PRHS) after gastric bypass surgery (GBS) are lacking. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) are advocated but might cause early dumping and lack specificity. This study aims to evaluate glucometabolic responses and symptoms during liquid and solid mixed meal tolerance tests (LMMTT and SMMTT).
Methods: Twenty-two subjects at least 1 year after GBS, divided into PRHS and non-PRHS based on clinical assessment and 14 control subjects (6 normal-weight, 8 with obesity) participated. All underwent 3-h LMMTT and SMMTT during which glucometabolic responses as well as hypoglycaemic symptoms using the Edinburgh hypoglycaemia symptom scale (EHSS) were assessed.
Results: During LMMTT, nadir glucose levels nor frequency of levels < 70 mg/dl and < 54 mg/dl did differ between groups. LMMTT could not differentiate between PRHS and non-PRHS in terms of total count of symptoms, and the number of symptoms was not associated with low glycaemia. During SMMTT, glucometabolic responses were similar between PRHS and non-PRHS. However, significantly more hypoglycaemic symptoms were evocated in the group with PRHS compared to those without during the second phase of SMMTT, with more neuroglycopenic and malaise symptoms in the subjects with PRHS. The decrease rate of glucose was higher in subjects with PRHS with malaise symptoms from 105 to 180 min compared to those without malaise.
Conclusion: LMMTT is not able to differentiate hypoglycaemic symptoms and low glycaemic values between subjects with PRHS and subjects without PRHS, whereas SMMTT could be of greater value. The clinical value of set glucose levels and the use of other biochemical parameters used to diagnose PRHS needs to be further evaluated.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Mixed meal test; Postprandial reactive syndrome.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Pories WJ, Mehaffey JH, Staton KM. The surgical treatment of type two diabetes mellitus. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91(4):821–36 (viii).
-
- Louwagie P NM, Dossche D, Camberlin C, ten Geuzendam B, Van den Heede K, Van Brabandt H. Bariatric surgery: an hta report on the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness . . 2019. KCE Report 316.
-
- Yan G, Wang J, Zhang J, Gao K, Zhao Q, Xu X. Long-term outcomes of macrovascular diseases and metabolic indicators of bariatric surgery for severe obesity type 2 diabetes patients with a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0224828.
-
- Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Association of bariatric surgery with long-term remission of type 2 diabetes and with microvascular and macrovascular complications. JAMA. 2014;311(22):2297–304.
-
- Honka H, Salehi M. Postprandial hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery: from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2019;22(4):295–302.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
