Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):440-446.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf066.

Informing prostate cancer screening policy makers in the European Union: lessons from cancer screening governance and policymaking

Affiliations

Informing prostate cancer screening policy makers in the European Union: lessons from cancer screening governance and policymaking

Sarah Collen et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) poses a significant global health threat, with high incidence and mortality rates. In 2022, the Council of the European Union (EU) updated its screening recommendations, prioritizing PCa screening. This signals a crucial step towards establishing new early detection programmes in EU member states. This study investigates the role of policy makers and governance in cancer screening to inform the development of PCa screening. We had a mixed-method study design. First, a rapid review was conducted on policy making and governance in EU-funded cancer screening initiatives. Second, a focus group discussion reviewed study concepts and methods. Third, a systematic literature review was performed and, fourth, a series of in-depth interviews with actors involved in PCa screening pilots was conducted. Data were analysed thematically and the findings are used to propose 10 recommendations for policy makers. The results of the rapid review and focus group discussion framed the study in the context of existing cancer screening programmes across the EU, and highlighted what already exists in terms of governance tools and methodology. The literature review and in-depth interviews presented key learnings from the literature and real-life settings. These findings are reported using a pre-existing conceptional framework for effective health system governance. The study underscores the critical importance of governance in effective cancer screening programmes. Ten recommendations are proposed, including: defining cancer screening governance, allocating budgets and defining common approaches and key performance indicators for evaluation, establishing methods to enhance citizen participation, and reinforcing network governance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timeline for EU Joint Actions on Cancer and Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map of actors identified from EU Joint Action rapid review.

References

    1. European Cancer Information System (ECIS). Prostate cancer factsheet 2020 EU-27 [Internet].https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/factsheets.php (4 January 2023, date last accessed).
    1. OJEU:13.12.2022; C473/1-10. Council Recommendation of 9 December 2022 on strengthening prevention through early detection: a new EU approach on cancer screening replacing Council Recommendation 2003/878/EC. (2022/C 473/01) [Internet]. 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022H1213... (8 January 2023, date last accessed).
    1. Van Poppel H, Albreht T, Basu P et al. Serum PSA-based early detection of prostate cancer in Europe and globally: past, present and future. Nat Rev Urol 2022;19:562–72. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines [Internet]. 2002. http://www.hdnet.org
    1. Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A et al. Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in the European Union Member States—summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer 2018;142:44–56. 10.1002/ijc.31043 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types