Recommendations on Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. The Milan Jury-Based Consensus
- PMID: 40478744
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006773
Recommendations on Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. The Milan Jury-Based Consensus
Abstract
Objective: To establish comprehensive recommendations on the management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and to identify areas in need of future investigation.
Summary background data: The lack of consensus in management of pCCA across institutions worldwide impairs optimal patient care and best-achievable oncological outcome. A holistic and critical assessment of the body of evidence and collaborative guidance are required.
Methods: The Consensus4pCCA conference developed unbiased consensus using the Zurich-Danish model. An impartial and multidisciplinary jury adopted comprehensive recommendations grounded on the work of eight expert panels answering predefined clinical questions and considering the best-quality evidence through a systematic review. The development of recommendations complied with GRADE and SIGN50 methodologies.
Results: Seventy-one international experts considered 570 studies. Ten jury members concluded 71 recommendations covering definition and diagnosis, preoperative assessment and optimization, surgical resection, liver transplantation, and outcome reporting for pCCA patients. The consensus underscored that making patients amenable to high-quality curative resection and reducing its associated morbidity must be of highest priority. As such, multidisciplinary expertise and centralized care at all stages of disease management are critical to ensure both safety and oncological adequacy. To overcome the evidence-gap for rare diseases like pCCA, the jury urged large-scale registries to address open questions across the disease continuum and highlighted priorities for future investigation.
Conclusion: The Consensus4pCCA represents an unprecedented commitment to collectively harmonize global treatment strategies for pCCA. This collective effort bridges the gap between expert opinions and clinical evidence and holds great promise to improve patient outcomes in the future.
Keywords: biliary drainage; chemotherapy; consensus; liver hypertrophy; liver transplantation; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; recommendations; resectability; zurich-danish model.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Fertil Steril. 2023 Oct;120(4):767-793. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 37589624
-
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023. PMID: 37580314 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Therapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art.Visc Med. 2021 Feb;37(1):18-25. doi: 10.1159/000514032. Epub 2021 Jan 7. Visc Med. 2021. PMID: 33708815 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can the Limits of Liver Transplantation Be Expanded in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma?J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Dec;53(4):1104-1112. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00735-6. Epub 2021 Nov 5. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34738188 Review.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous