Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325186.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325186. eCollection 2025.

Protocol for evaluation of a virtual wheelchair simulator in assessing mobility skills and cognitive abilities in diverse populations: A multicentric mixed-methods pilot study

Affiliations

Protocol for evaluation of a virtual wheelchair simulator in assessing mobility skills and cognitive abilities in diverse populations: A multicentric mixed-methods pilot study

Débora Pereira Salgado et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Current wheelchair acquisition, prescription, and training programs often require comprehensive assessments integrating both power mobility skills and cognitive abilities. While wheelchair simulators offer promise for these assessments, but they have not been fully validated.

Objective: This study aims to develop and refine a protocol for evaluating the feasibility, reliability and preliminary validity of virtual wheelchair simulator metrics in assessing users' current power mobility skills and cognitive abilities, following STARD guidelines. Reference standards include the self-report Wheelchair Skill Test (WST), Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Methods: This multicentric, mixed-methods pilot study will recruit participants with mobility disabilities, a control group of individuals without disabilities, and healthcare professionals to use a virtual wheelchair simulator. Healthcare professionals will evaluate the simulator's assessments and provide expert feedback on the protocol. Quantitative data will include simulator-derived performance metrics compared to reference standards, and physiological data (e.g., heart rate, skin conductance, temperature, inter-beat-intervals, accelerometer and eye-gaze tracking). Qualitative data (semi-structured interviews) will capture user experiences and insights for protocol refinement. The Quality of Experience (QoE) evaluation framework will assess cognitive workload (NASA-TLX and PAAS), usability (System Usability Scale), immersion (IGroup Presence Questionnaire), and emotion (Self-Assessment Manikin). Data analysis will include correlation analysis, regression models, thematic analysis, and statistical tests (e.g., independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests) to compare simulator-based performance across groups.

Discussion: This pilot study seeks to fill critical gaps in current wheelchair training and prescription methods by exploring the use of a virtual simulator to objectively assess both cognitive abilities and power mobility skills. Integrating the QoE assessment framework will provide insights into user interactions, ensuring that the simulator supports tailored training and improve user outcomes in mobility, and safety. Future research may extend this protocol to clinical settings to further evaluate its applicability and effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Wheelchair simulator system.
(A) Diagram of the simulator’s core components, including the computer, virtual environment, and control interface (joystick controller). (B) Devices for capturing user responses and physiological data.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Study procedure overview.
Schematic representation of the mixed-methods study. The procedure includes participant recruitment, pre-assessment, simulator-based tasks with continuous data recording, post-assessment questionnaires, and final evaluation sessions.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Phase 1 overview.
Illustration of Phase 1 involving wheelchair users and control participants. This phase includes pre-assessment, simulator task performance, continuous data capture, post-assessment, and comparison of simulator-based metrics with clinical scores.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Phase 2 overview.
Illustration of Phase 2 involving healthcare professionals. Phase 1 performance records are independently reviewed and scored using the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT) sheet, followed by qualitative interviews and evaluation of the simulator’s assessment utility.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. Wheelchair provision guidelines. World Health Organization; 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074521 - PubMed
    1. Pellichero A, Kenyon LK, Best KL, Lamontagne M-E, Lavoie MD, Sorita É, et al.. Relationships between Cognitive Functioning and Powered Mobility Device Use: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12467. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cullen B, O’Neill B, Evans JJ. Neuropsychological predictors of powered wheelchair use: a prospective follow-up study. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(9):836–46. doi: 10.1177/0269215508091873 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tefft D, Guerette P, Furumasu J. Cognitive predictors of young children’s readiness for powered mobility. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41(10):665–70. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299001371 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nilsson LM, Eklund M. Driving to learn: Powered wheelchair training for those with cognitive disabilities. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006;13(11):517–27. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.11.22466 - DOI