How does feeding strategy affect the aromatic volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of organic fresh pork?
- PMID: 40479875
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109869
How does feeding strategy affect the aromatic volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of organic fresh pork?
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate two feeding strategies on pork quality in organic farming using 77 non-castrated male pigs (Piétrain × Large White) reared in two batches, each including two groups. Male littermates were allocated to either a Control group (C, n = 37), fed following the organic specifications, or to a group receiving an organic test feed mainly based on French raw materials and containing more fibre and omega-3 fatty acids (Bio+, n = 40). Within batch, each group was reared in one pen from the same building on deep straw bedding with free outdoor access, with ad libitum feeding from around 33 kg until slaughter at around 128 kg of live weight. Loin meat samples were analysed by a trained sensory panel and by SPME-GC-MS to identify the main volatile compounds. Meat from Bio+ pigs showed a significantly more intense red colour (P < 0.01), but lower aromatic persistency (P < 0.05) and tended to be less tender (P = 0.08) than meat from C pigs. None of the samples were qualified as boar tainted. A total of 27 volatile compounds were quantified, with more compounds present in Bio+ pigs, probably due to the greater diversity of raw ingredients in the feeds. The multi-dimensional analyses enabled to observe relationships between volatile compounds and sensory traits but did not differentiate the two feeding strategies. Bio+ feeding strategy compared to C influenced some organoleptic characteristics (red colour of raw meat, aromatic persistency) without modifying the texture, odour and flavour of organic cooked pork.
Keywords: Feed composition; GC-MS SPME; Meat quality; Non-castrated pigs; Sensory analysis; Volatile compounds.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Feeding strategy in organic pig farming as a lever to improve various quality dimensions of pork.Animal. 2024 Jul;18(7):101190. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101190. Epub 2024 May 16. Animal. 2024. PMID: 38870587
-
Effects of space allowance, roughage supplement, and enrichment provision on growth, carcass weight and meat quality in conventional indoor pig husbandry.Meat Sci. 2025 Nov;229:109916. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2025.109916. Epub 2025 Jul 22. Meat Sci. 2025. PMID: 40749367
-
The assessment of the impact of feeding systems on meat quality: a comparison of conventional and organic beef production.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Jun 14;57(5):268. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04521-5. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025. PMID: 40515867
-
Feeding management practices and feed characteristics associated with Salmonella prevalence in live and slaughtered market-weight finisher swine: a systematic review and summation of evidence from 1950 to 2005.Prev Vet Med. 2008 Nov 17;87(3-4):213-28. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.06.017. Epub 2008 Jul 30. Prev Vet Med. 2008. PMID: 18667253
-
Sertindole for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 16034864 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous