Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 5;112(6):1489-1495.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.003.

Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification

Affiliations

Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification

Rehan M Villani et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

When investigating whether a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Functional assays of higher and higher throughput are increasingly being generated and, when appropriate, can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification. Despite functional assay data representing unprecedented value for genomic diagnostics, challenges remain around the application of functional evidence in variant curation. To investigate a growing gap articulated in recent international studies, we surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. The survey results echo the universal difficulty in evaluating functional evidence but expand on this by indicating that even self-proclaimed expert respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified the need for support resources and educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. We then collated a list of 226 functional assays and the evidence strength recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels. Specific assays for more than 45,000 variants were evaluated, but evidence recommendations were generally limited to lower throughput and strength. As an initial step, we provide our collated list of assay evidence as a source of international expert opinion on the evaluation of functional- evidence and conclude that these results highlight an opportunity to develop additional support resources to fully utilize functional evidence in clinical practice.

Keywords: ACMG/AMP guidelines; assay; clinical genomics; diagnostic genetics; education; functional evidence; pathogenicity assessment; variant classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Update of

References

    1. Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brnich S.E., Abou Tayoun A.N., Couch F.J., Cutting G.R., Greenblatt M.S., Heinen C.D., Kanavy D.M., Luo X., McNulty S.M., Starita L.M., et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med. 2019;12:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brnich S.E., Rivera-Muñoz E.A., Berg J.S. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1531–1541. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rivera-Munoz E.A., Milko L.V., Harrison S.M., Azzariti D.R., Kurtz C.L., Lee K., Mester J.L., Weaver M.A., Currey E., Craigen W., et al. ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1614–1622. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanavy D.M., McNulty S.M., Jairath M.K., Brnich S.E., Bizon C., Powell B.C., Berg J.S. Comparative analysis of functional assay evidence use by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels. Genome Med. 2019;11:77. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources