Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification
- PMID: 40480201
- PMCID: PMC12256917
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.003
Consultation informs strategies for improving the use of functional evidence in variant classification
Abstract
When investigating whether a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Functional assays of higher and higher throughput are increasingly being generated and, when appropriate, can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification. Despite functional assay data representing unprecedented value for genomic diagnostics, challenges remain around the application of functional evidence in variant curation. To investigate a growing gap articulated in recent international studies, we surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. The survey results echo the universal difficulty in evaluating functional evidence but expand on this by indicating that even self-proclaimed expert respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified the need for support resources and educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. We then collated a list of 226 functional assays and the evidence strength recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels. Specific assays for more than 45,000 variants were evaluated, but evidence recommendations were generally limited to lower throughput and strength. As an initial step, we provide our collated list of assay evidence as a source of international expert opinion on the evaluation of functional- evidence and conclude that these results highlight an opportunity to develop additional support resources to fully utilize functional evidence in clinical practice.
Keywords: ACMG/AMP guidelines; assay; clinical genomics; diagnostic genetics; education; functional evidence; pathogenicity assessment; variant classification.
Copyright © 2025 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Update of
-
Consultation informs strategies to improve functional evidence use in variant classification.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Dec 6:2024.12.04.24318523. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.04.24318523. medRxiv. 2024. Update in: Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jun 5;112(6):1489-1495. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.003. PMID: 39677445 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brnich S.E., Abou Tayoun A.N., Couch F.J., Cutting G.R., Greenblatt M.S., Heinen C.D., Kanavy D.M., Luo X., McNulty S.M., Starita L.M., et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med. 2019;12:3. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rivera-Munoz E.A., Milko L.V., Harrison S.M., Azzariti D.R., Kurtz C.L., Lee K., Mester J.L., Weaver M.A., Currey E., Craigen W., et al. ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Hum. Mutat. 2018;39:1614–1622. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous